Site teardown · Delekus
delekus.com
Site health · September 17, 2026
Prepared by Harvv

What your site is actually doing.

One page: what is working, what is costing you visitors, and what to fix next. A phone-and-desktop teardown of the live site: 4 phone loads + 2 desktop loads, cross-checked against real Chrome users from Google's field data. No login, no insider access, no Harvv pixel needed. The full evidence is at the bottom.

September 17, 2026·External scan + real-user field data·4 mobile + 2 desktop loads + Google CrUX·Download as PDF

Working

What's already working. These held up across every load.

2.2s

Speed is good.

0.01

Layout stays put as it loads.

✓

Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

Costing you

Ranked by what hurts conversion most. Full evidence below.

12

A floating widget is covering a clickable element

41%

Add quotations so AI engines cite this page

20/61

Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile

1

JavaScript crashed while the page was loading

13.7MB

Page is heavy and slow on mobile data

120

Google is writing your search snippet for you

Fixing next
obscured control, tap targets and page weight.

3 small changes, on the pages people actually land on: A floating widget is covering a clickable element; Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile; Page is heavy and slow on mobile data. We re-measure the same samples after.

4
hours
AI search visibility
How visible is delekus.com to AI search?
ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews are the new front page. The AI checks in this report are a preview. A free account turns them into a live 0 to 100 score, tracked daily and benchmarked against your competitors.
See the full AI report, free

01Findings, ranked by what hurts conversion most

SeverityFindingHow we know
HighA floating widget is covering a clickable elementBothConversionAccessibility (WCAG)
12 clickable elements are sitting underneath a fixed overlay (div#cm_disclaimer-header over button "Previous slide"), so a visitor who tries to tap them hits the widget on top instead. The element is there and looks fine in a preview, it just can't be reached. Move the floating widget to a clear corner, lower its z-index, or add spacing so it never overlaps your links and buttons.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumTiny buttons are hard to tap on mobileMobileAccessibility (WCAG)Conversion
20 of 61 tappable items on this page (33%) measure under 24 pixels on their shorter side, below the 24px floor WCAG 2.5.8 sets for accessibility and well under the platform minimums (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp) for reliable tapping, and the same ones came up small on every test load. When visitors can't hit what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave instead of trying again.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumJavaScript crashed while the page was loadingBothConversionTracking
1 script error fired during page load. When a script crashes, buttons sometimes stop working, analytics stop firing, and the visitor has no warning. Worth opening the browser console to find which script failed.
The exact errors we found:
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
median across loads
MediumPage is heavy and slow on mobile dataBothPerformance
Each visit downloads about 13.7 MB, roughly 12178 KB of images and 1364 KB of JavaScript across 112 separate downloads. On a fast connection that's fine. On a phone with patchy mobile data, that's several seconds of blank screen before the page is readable.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
median across loads
LowImages have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothPerformanceSEO
18 of 18 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0.01, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowUnused JavaScript is being downloadedBothPerformance
Code that never runs on this page still costs download and parse time on every visit. Splitting or removing it speeds up load. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 1,057 KiB.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowUnused CSS is being downloadedBothPerformance
Style rules that this page never uses still block rendering while they download. Trimming them frees the paint path. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 210 KiB.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowThe page loads from a lot of third-party servicesBoth
Around 17 separate outside domains load on this page (analytics, ads, chat widgets, fonts). Each one is a connection that can be slow, fail, or change behavior outside your control.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
median across loads
LowNo email capture or newsletter detectedBothConversion
No email input field was found in the page, and no email-marketing tag (Klaviyo, Mailchimp, Substack, ConvertKit, Beehiiv, MailerLite, ActiveCampaign, Omnisend, Brevo, Drip or Buttondown) was detected. A form that loads after JavaScript runs, or one behind a popup or a separate page, will not be visible to this check. If capturing visitors is relevant to this site, an email signup builds an owned audience you keep regardless of ad costs. Not every site needs one.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo visible contact details (email or phone)BothConversion
This page exposes no email address, no phone link, no contact form and no link to a contact page. For higher-value or trust-sensitive purchases, a clear way to reach a human reduces hesitation. A contact route that only appears after JavaScript runs, or that lives on a page not checked here, will not be visible to this check. Add an email or phone link in the header or footer.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
HighAdd quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothAI SearchSEO
Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 1 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumGoogle is writing your search snippet for youBothSEO
This page has no meta description, so Google grabs whatever text it finds on the page and shows that under your title in search results. Usually it's not the pitch you'd write yourself. Adding a 120 to 160 character summary is one of the easier wins for search click-through.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo third-party analytics tag detectedBothTracking
No Google Analytics, GA4, or other third-party analytics tag was found in the page. If you rely only on platform or server-side analytics that is fine; but if not, a third-party tag is the baseline way to see how many visitors arrive, where they come from, and what converts. First-party or server-side analytics are not detectable from the outside, so this may already be handled.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumThe page has no main headingBoth
There is no <h1>. Search engines and screen readers use the H1 to understand what the page is about. Add exactly one that states the page's purpose.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumNo XML sitemap foundBoth
No sitemap.xml at the standard location and none listed in robots.txt. A sitemap tells search engines every page you want indexed; without it they rely on link discovery and may miss pages.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's rankingBoth
When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs (think tracking parameters or session IDs), Google can split your ranking signal across them. A single canonical tag tells Google which version counts.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowLinks to this page will look bare when sharedBoth
The page is missing its Open Graph title and image, so when someone shares it on Facebook, LinkedIn, iMessage, or Slack the preview has no title and image. A flat grey link gets far fewer clicks than one with an image and headline.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo structured data for rich search resultsBoth
The page has no schema.org markup. Adding the right type (Product, Article, Organization, FAQ) lets Google show rich results like star ratings and prices, which lift click-through for free.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowSitemap URL redirectsBothSEO
A URL listed in your sitemap redirects to a different URL. Sitemaps should list final destination URLs; redirected entries waste crawl budget and dilute ranking signals. (Found across a sample of 1 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)
The exact examples we found:
  • https://delekus.com -> https://delekus.com/overview/default.aspx
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo llms.txt fileBothSEO
No /llms.txt. Optional: some AI tools read this file (Anthropic, Vercel, Stripe, Cloudflare and Hugging Face publish one, and AI coding assistants use it to find docs), so adding one is a cheap courtesy to them. Google has said in writing that Google Search and its AI features do not use llms.txt, so do not expect a search-ranking or AI Overviews benefit from it.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowSecurity headers are missing or weakBothSecurity
The server response is missing browser-hardening headers that protect visitors and are a standard security and agency checklist item. Missing or weak here: Content-Security-Policy (the main defense against injected and cross-site scripts). These are set at the server, CDN, or host level (most platforms expose them in settings or a config file) and do not change how the site looks or performs.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowSome links do not describe where they goBothAccessibility (WCAG)Conversion
Links like "click here" or "read more" tell screen-reader users and search engines nothing about the destination. Lighthouse measured: 4 links found.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowHeadings skip levelsBothAccessibility (WCAG)
Skipping a heading level breaks the document outline that screen readers and search engines rely on. On this page the outline jumps to an H6 without the level above it, at "Chart". Lighthouse flagged 1 heading out of order.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT

Accessibility findings are automated checks against Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 and 2.2. They flag potential barriers and legal risk, not a certification or a determination of compliance with the ADA, Section 508, or EN 301 549. Automated testing catches only a subset of issues; a full conformance review needs manual and assistive-technology testing by a qualified reviewer.

From finding to fix
Want the fix, not just the finding?
Install Harvv and we turn each issue above into a ready-to-paste prompt for your AI coding assistant. Drop it into Cursor, Claude, or Copilot and the diagnosis becomes a concrete code change, written against this exact page.
Get the fix prompts

"How we know": unlabeled = a deterministic fact, identical on every load (e.g. element sizes). Most findings are this kind, so we only mark the exceptions: median across loads = a noisy lab metric, reported as a median. real-user field data = Google CrUX, actual Chrome visitors.

Structural and AI-search checks crawl up to 8 pages from your sitemap (a sample, not your full site). "Broken" means a link returned 404, 410, or 5xx, or did not respond; access-controlled pages (401, 403) are not counted.

01bTake the whole report to your AI

Every finding above in one payload, with the reasoning behind each one. The prompt is written to be pasted into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT. The JSON is for piping into your own tooling.

Includes the site context, what is already working (so your assistant does not "fix" it), and every finding with its severity, evidence, and why it matters.
Audit of https://delekus.com, run September 17, 2026. 23 issues were found. I want them fixed.

## Context
- Site: https://delekus.com
- Mobile LCP (lab median): 320 ms
- Desktop LCP (lab median): 336 ms
- Page weight (median): 13.7 MB
- Tap targets under 44px: 33% (20 of 61)
- Evidence base: 4 mobile + 2 desktop loads + Google CrUX field data

## Already working, do not change these
- Speed is good: Real Chrome visitors see the main content in 2.2s (Google's "good" bar is 2.5s). This is field data from actual users, not a lab guess.
- Layout stays put as it loads: Real visitors see only 0.01 of layout shift (good is under 0.10), so the page is not jumping under their finger.
- Layout holds on phone and desktop: Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

## Issues, most damaging first

### 1. [HIGH] A floating widget is covering a clickable element
Category: Conversion, Accessibility (WCAG)
Why it matters: 12 clickable elements are sitting underneath a fixed overlay (div#cm_disclaimer-header over button "Previous slide"), so a visitor who tries to tap them hits the widget on top instead. The element is there and looks fine in a preview, it just can't be reached. Move the floating widget to a clear corner, lower its z-index, or add spacing so it never overlaps your links and buttons.
Exact elements found (6 of 12): button "Previous slide" under div#cm_disclaimer-header, button "Next slide" under div#cm_disclaimer-header, a "SIGN UP FOR EMAIL ALERTS 
(O" under div#cm_disclaimer-header, a "About Us" under p, a "Business Operations" under p, a "Investors" under p

### 2. [HIGH] Add quotations so AI engines cite this page
Category: AI Search, SEO
Why it matters: Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 1 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)

### 3. [MEDIUM] Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile
Affects: mobile only
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Conversion
Why it matters: 20 of 61 tappable items on this page (33%) measure under 24 pixels on their shorter side, below the 24px floor WCAG 2.5.8 sets for accessibility and well under the platform minimums (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp) for reliable tapping, and the same ones came up small on every test load. When visitors can't hit what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave instead of trying again.
Exact elements found (8 of 20): button 30x20 "close disclaimer", button 30x20 (no visible label), a 93x20 (no visible label), a 93x20 (no visible label), button 8x8 "Go to slide 1", button 8x8 "Go to slide 2", button 8x8 "Go to slide 3", a 88x18 "READ MORE 
REFINING"

### 4. [MEDIUM] JavaScript crashed while the page was loading
Category: Conversion, Tracking
Why it matters: 1 script error fired during page load. When a script crashes, buttons sometimes stop working, analytics stop firing, and the visitor has no warning. Worth opening the browser console to find which script failed.
Exact elements found: $(...).counterUp is not a function
How we know: median across loads

### 5. [MEDIUM] Page is heavy and slow on mobile data
Category: Performance
Why it matters: Each visit downloads about 13.7 MB, roughly 12178 KB of images and 1364 KB of JavaScript across 112 separate downloads. On a fast connection that's fine. On a phone with patchy mobile data, that's several seconds of blank screen before the page is readable.
How we know: median across loads

### 6. [MEDIUM] Google is writing your search snippet for you
Category: SEO
Why it matters: This page has no meta description, so Google grabs whatever text it finds on the page and shows that under your title in search results. Usually it's not the pitch you'd write yourself. Adding a 120 to 160 character summary is one of the easier wins for search click-through.

### 7. [MEDIUM] The page has no main heading
Why it matters: There is no <h1>. Search engines and screen readers use the H1 to understand what the page is about. Add exactly one that states the page's purpose.

### 8. [MEDIUM] No XML sitemap found
Why it matters: No sitemap.xml at the standard location and none listed in robots.txt. A sitemap tells search engines every page you want indexed; without it they rely on link discovery and may miss pages.

### 9. [LOW] Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)
Category: Performance, SEO
Why it matters: 18 of 18 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0.01, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift.
Exact elements found (6 of 18): Delek-Logo-Long-cropped.png "Delek US Logo", Delek-Logo-Long-cropped.png "Delek US company logo", about-us-nav.png, business-operations-nav.png, investors-nav.png, careers-nav.png

### 10. [LOW] Unused JavaScript is being downloaded
Category: Performance
Why it matters: Code that never runs on this page still costs download and parse time on every visit. Splitting or removing it speeds up load. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 1,057 KiB.

### 11. [LOW] Unused CSS is being downloaded
Category: Performance
Why it matters: Style rules that this page never uses still block rendering while they download. Trimming them frees the paint path. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 210 KiB.

### 12. [LOW] The page loads from a lot of third-party services
Why it matters: Around 17 separate outside domains load on this page (analytics, ads, chat widgets, fonts). Each one is a connection that can be slow, fail, or change behavior outside your control.
How we know: median across loads

### 13. [LOW] No email capture or newsletter detected
Category: Conversion
Why it matters: No email input field was found in the page, and no email-marketing tag (Klaviyo, Mailchimp, Substack, ConvertKit, Beehiiv, MailerLite, ActiveCampaign, Omnisend, Brevo, Drip or Buttondown) was detected. A form that loads after JavaScript runs, or one behind a popup or a separate page, will not be visible to this check. If capturing visitors is relevant to this site, an email signup builds an owned audience you keep regardless of ad costs. Not every site needs one.

### 14. [LOW] No visible contact details (email or phone)
Category: Conversion
Why it matters: This page exposes no email address, no phone link, no contact form and no link to a contact page. For higher-value or trust-sensitive purchases, a clear way to reach a human reduces hesitation. A contact route that only appears after JavaScript runs, or that lives on a page not checked here, will not be visible to this check. Add an email or phone link in the header or footer.

### 15. [LOW] No third-party analytics tag detected
Category: Tracking
Why it matters: No Google Analytics, GA4, or other third-party analytics tag was found in the page. If you rely only on platform or server-side analytics that is fine; but if not, a third-party tag is the baseline way to see how many visitors arrive, where they come from, and what converts. First-party or server-side analytics are not detectable from the outside, so this may already be handled.

### 16. [LOW] No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's ranking
Why it matters: When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs (think tracking parameters or session IDs), Google can split your ranking signal across them. A single canonical tag tells Google which version counts.

### 17. [LOW] Links to this page will look bare when shared
Why it matters: The page is missing its Open Graph title and image, so when someone shares it on Facebook, LinkedIn, iMessage, or Slack the preview has no title and image. A flat grey link gets far fewer clicks than one with an image and headline.

### 18. [LOW] No structured data for rich search results
Why it matters: The page has no schema.org markup. Adding the right type (Product, Article, Organization, FAQ) lets Google show rich results like star ratings and prices, which lift click-through for free.

### 19. [LOW] Sitemap URL redirects
Category: SEO
Why it matters: A URL listed in your sitemap redirects to a different URL. Sitemaps should list final destination URLs; redirected entries waste crawl budget and dilute ranking signals. (Found across a sample of 1 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)
Exact examples found: https://delekus.com -> https://delekus.com/overview/default.aspx

### 20. [LOW] No llms.txt file
Category: SEO
Why it matters: No /llms.txt. Optional: some AI tools read this file (Anthropic, Vercel, Stripe, Cloudflare and Hugging Face publish one, and AI coding assistants use it to find docs), so adding one is a cheap courtesy to them. Google has said in writing that Google Search and its AI features do not use llms.txt, so do not expect a search-ranking or AI Overviews benefit from it.

### 21. [LOW] Security headers are missing or weak
Category: Security
Why it matters: The server response is missing browser-hardening headers that protect visitors and are a standard security and agency checklist item. Missing or weak here: Content-Security-Policy (the main defense against injected and cross-site scripts). These are set at the server, CDN, or host level (most platforms expose them in settings or a config file) and do not change how the site looks or performs.

### 22. [LOW] Some links do not describe where they go
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Conversion
Why it matters: Links like "click here" or "read more" tell screen-reader users and search engines nothing about the destination. Lighthouse measured: 4 links found.

### 23. [LOW] Headings skip levels
Category: Accessibility (WCAG)
Why it matters: Skipping a heading level breaks the document outline that screen readers and search engines rely on. On this page the outline jumps to an H6 without the level above it, at "Chart". Lighthouse flagged 1 heading out of order.

## How to respond
Work through the issues in order. For each one give me the specific change that fixes it: real code or real copy, not advice. Keep changes minimal and match the existing style of the site.
Where several issues share one root cause, say so and fix it once rather than patching each symptom.
If an issue cannot be fixed without seeing more of the code, say exactly which file or selector you need instead of guessing.
23 findings, ready to paste

02Performance: phone, desktop, and real visitors

MetricMobileDesktopRead
TTFB (lab median)64 ms63 msLab
FCP (lab median)304 ms328 msLab
LCP (lab median)320 ms336 msGood
Page weight (median)13.7 MB13.7 MBWatch
Real LCP (p75, origin)2.2 sGood
Real INP (p75)153 msGood
Real CLS (p75)0.01Good

Google Lighthouse (lab): Performance 25 mobile / 32 desktop, SEO 83, Accessibility 94, Best Practices 54.

Lab numbers are from a headless mobile browser on an unthrottled connection: treat them as a floor, not a typical experience.

03Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile

20 of 61 tappable items on this page come in below the platform minimums for reliable tapping on a phone (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp; WCAG 2.5.8 sets 24px as the hard accessibility floor). The same ones came up small on every one of the 4 test loads, so this is the page itself, not a fluke.

When customers can't tap what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave. They don't file a bug. They don't try again. They just leave. A desktop dashboard can't see this because it's the difference between a thumb and a cursor.

The buttons measuring below the minimum on this scan:

  • button 30x20 "close disclaimer"
  • button 30x20 (no visible label)
  • a 93x20 (no visible label)
  • a 93x20 (no visible label)
  • button 8x8 "Go to slide 1"
  • button 8x8 "Go to slide 2"
  • button 8x8 "Go to slide 3"
  • a 88x18 "READ MORE REFINING"

The fix is CSS-only on most sites: add padding around the icon (don't just change the icon size) so the actual tap area is at least 44×44 pixels. No redesign, no new assets.

04Technical SEO & structured data

CheckResult
TitleDelek US Holdings, Inc. - Overview (34 chars)
Meta descriptionMissing
H10 on page
CanonicalMissing
Structured data (JSON-LD)None
Open GraphIncomplete

05The fix checklist

Everything to fix, priority first, each tagged with the screen it affects and a rough effort. Work top to bottom.

  1. A floating widget is covering a clickable elementBothCSS only
  2. Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobileMobileCSS only
  3. JavaScript crashed while the page was loadingBothDev afternoon
  4. Page is heavy and slow on mobile dataBothSmall
  5. Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothCSS only
  6. Unused JavaScript is being downloadedBothVaries
  7. Unused CSS is being downloadedBothVaries
  8. The page loads from a lot of third-party servicesBothDev afternoon
  9. No email capture or newsletter detectedBothVaries
  10. No visible contact details (email or phone)BothVaries
  11. Add quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothVaries
  12. Google is writing your search snippet for youBoth1 line
  13. No third-party analytics tag detectedBothDev afternoon
  14. The page has no main headingBothVaries
  15. No XML sitemap foundBothVaries
  16. No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's rankingBoth1 line
  17. Links to this page will look bare when sharedBoth1 line
  18. No structured data for rich search resultsBothVaries
  19. Sitemap URL redirectsBothVaries
  20. No llms.txt fileBothVaries
  21. Security headers are missing or weakBothVaries
  22. Some links do not describe where they goBothVaries
  23. Headings skip levelsBothVaries

Effort is a rough read from the outside: "CSS only" means no new assets or backend work, "1 line" means a single tag, "Dev afternoon" means a developer needs to touch tracking or scripts.

06What this report cannot tell you

Everything above is from the outside, looking at the page on a simulated phone and desktop. The questions that actually decide revenue need real visitors. Install the Harvv pixel (one script tag, 16 KB, zero personal data, no engineering project) and within about 72 hours you'd know which buttons real customers tapped and missed, how often Google Analytics is missing visits, and exactly where mobile shoppers stalled and left. This report shows you where to look. The pixel shows you how often it happens, and to whom.

What to do next
See this same depth on your real visitors, every day.

Drop the Harvv pixel on delekus.com and we turn this one-off scan into ongoing measured behavior: which taps miss, where sessions stall, and the real drop rates. Free to start, no card needed.

Add the pixel free

07How we did this, and what it can't prove

  • 4 mobile + 2 desktop loads of one URL from headless Chrome (iPhone viewport at 390px, desktop at 1366px), September 17, 2026. Enough loads to separate real defects from random noise, not a full-site crawl.
  • Lab numbers, not real-user numbers, except the CrUX rows, which are real Chrome users. Real devices on real networks run slower.
  • Friction is inferred, not counted. We can prove a button is small. We can't, from the outside, count how often it causes a missed tap. That requires the pixel on a live page.

About Harvv, the source of this teardown

Harvv is a behavioral UX analytics platform (harvv.com). A lightweight JavaScript pixel captures how real visitors behave on a site (dead clicks, rage clicks, scroll depth, Core Web Vitals, JavaScript errors, and 50+ other signals) and the engine turns them into prioritized, plain-English findings. This teardown is the outside-in version of that: the same detectors run against a public page, with no pixel installed.

How to read it. Every finding here is a reproducible, automated measurement, not an opinion: element sizes, contrast ratios, load metrics, and structured-data checks that anyone can re-run against the same URL. The method is stated in full above. Automated testing catches a subset of issues, so this is a starting point, not a certification.

Full disclosure. Harvv makes the pixel that would measure the friction these findings imply, so we have a commercial interest. That is exactly why the findings are kept to things a reader can verify independently, and why nothing here is inflated: an unreproducible claim would undermine the tool it is meant to demonstrate.

Prepared by Harvv (harvv.com), a behavioral UX analytics platform. Last updated September 17, 2026.

harvv://this-page live
Scroll depth how far you read0%
Dead clicks clicks that did nothing0
Rage clicks frustration bursts0
Interactions clicks that worked0
event log · live