Site teardown · Habitude Ph
habitude.ph
Site health · August 31, 2026
Prepared by Harvv

What your site is actually doing.

One page: what is working, what is costing you visitors, and what to fix next. A phone-and-desktop teardown of the live site: 4 phone loads + 2 desktop loads. No login, no insider access, no Harvv pixel needed. The full evidence is at the bottom.

August 31, 2026·External scan·4 mobile + 2 desktop loads · no pixel data·Download as PDF

Working

What's already working. These held up across every load.

0.4s

Speed is good.

0

No JavaScript errors on load.

100/100

Lighthouse scores SEO 100/100. The fundamentals Google looks for are present.

Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

Costing you

Ranked by what hurts conversion most. Full evidence below.

41%

Add quotations so AI engines cite this page

faint

Some text is low-contrast and hard to read

14

Click activity may be invisible inside the Facebook in-app browser

131

Unused JavaScript is being downloaded

12

The page loads from a lot of third-party services

60

Search-result title is leaving room on the table

Fixing next
title.

One focused change, on the pages people actually land on: Search-result title is leaving room on the table. We re-measure the same samples after.

30
minutes
AI search visibility
How visible is habitude.ph to AI search?
ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews are the new front page. The AI checks in this report are a preview. A free account turns them into a live 0 to 100 score, tracked daily and benchmarked against your competitors.
See the full AI report, free

01Findings, ranked by what hurts conversion most

SeverityFindingHow we know
LowUnused JavaScript is being downloadedBothPerformance
Code that never runs on this page still costs download and parse time on every visit. Splitting or removing it speeds up load. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 131 KiB.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowThe page loads from a lot of third-party servicesBoth
Around 12 separate outside domains load on this page (analytics, ads, chat widgets, fonts). Each one is a connection that can be slow, fail, or change behavior outside your control.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
median across loads
HighAdd quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothAI SearchSEO
Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 8 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowSearch-result title is leaving room on the tableBothSEO
Google gives you about 60 characters of headline space in search results. This page is using 18. Adding the value proposition or a relevant keyword gives someone one more reason to click.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo third-party analytics tag detectedBothTracking
No Google Analytics, GA4, or other third-party analytics tag was found in the page. If you rely only on platform or server-side analytics that is fine; but if not, a third-party tag is the baseline way to see how many visitors arrive, where they come from, and what converts. First-party or server-side analytics are not detectable from the outside, so this may already be handled.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowSocial share image declared over insecure HTTPBothSEO
The Open Graph image is declared as an http:// URL, but the page also declares og:image:secure_url over https, and the big platforms (Facebook, LinkedIn, iMessage) use that fallback, so previews render. Strict scrapers and some AI crawlers only read og:image, though, and may skip the image. Hygiene fix: declare the https URL in og:image itself.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumClick activity may be invisible inside the Facebook in-app browserBothTracking
Patterns on this page (14 custom-element tags) tend to suppress click events inside Android Webview and iOS in-app browsers. Visitors arriving from Meta ads may register as zero-interaction sessions even when they're actively using the page. Add a server-side landing tracker so you don't lose that audience entirely.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
HighSome text is low-contrast and hard to readBothAccessibility (WCAG)
Text that does not stand out enough from its background is hard to read for many visitors, and fails accessibility guidelines Google checks.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowSecurity headers are missing or weakBothSecurity
The server response is missing browser-hardening headers that protect visitors and are a standard security and agency checklist item. Missing or weak here: a stronger HSTS policy (max-age at least 180 days plus includeSubDomains). These are set at the server, CDN, or host level (most platforms expose them in settings or a config file) and do not change how the site looks or performs.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowSome text is too small to read on phonesMobileAccessibility (WCAG)Conversion
10 chunks of text come in under 12 pixels on this page. Most visitors don't zoom, they just skim past anything that small. Bumping the smallest body text to 14 pixels makes the page read without effort.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
median across loads

Accessibility findings are automated checks against Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 and 2.2. They flag potential barriers and legal risk, not a certification or a determination of compliance with the ADA, Section 508, or EN 301 549. Automated testing catches only a subset of issues; a full conformance review needs manual and assistive-technology testing by a qualified reviewer.

From finding to fix
Want the fix, not just the finding?
Install Harvv and we turn each issue above into a ready-to-paste prompt for your AI coding assistant. Drop it into Cursor, Claude, or Copilot and the diagnosis becomes a concrete code change, written against this exact page.
Get the fix prompts

"How we know": unlabeled = a deterministic fact, identical on every load (e.g. element sizes). Most findings are this kind, so we only mark the exceptions: median across loads = a noisy lab metric, reported as a median. real-user field data = Google CrUX, actual Chrome visitors.

Structural and AI-search checks crawl up to 8 pages from your sitemap (a sample, not your full site). "Broken" means a link returned 404, 410, or 5xx, or did not respond; access-controlled pages (401, 403) are not counted.

01bTake the whole report to your AI

Every finding above in one payload, with the reasoning behind each one. The prompt is written to be pasted into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT. The JSON is for piping into your own tooling.

Includes the site context, what is already working (so your assistant does not "fix" it), and every finding with its severity, evidence, and why it matters.
Audit of https://www.habitude.ph/, run August 31, 2026. 10 issues were found. I want them fixed.

## Context
- Site: https://www.habitude.ph/
- Mobile LCP (lab median): 402 ms
- Desktop LCP (lab median): 346 ms
- Page weight (median): 1.9 MB
- Tap targets under 44px: 12% (6 of 51)
- Evidence base: 4 mobile + 2 desktop loads

## Already working, do not change these
- Speed is good: The main content paints in about 0.4s in our test loads, inside Google's 2.5s "good" threshold. Real networks are slower, but the page itself is not heavy.
- No JavaScript errors on load: Nothing threw a script error across the test loads, so buttons and tracking are not silently breaking mid-session.
- Search basics are in place: Lighthouse scores SEO 100/100. The fundamentals Google looks for are present.
- Layout holds on phone and desktop: Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

## Issues, most damaging first

### 1. [HIGH] Add quotations so AI engines cite this page
Category: AI Search, SEO
Why it matters: Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 8 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)

### 2. [HIGH] Some text is low-contrast and hard to read
Category: Accessibility (WCAG)
Why it matters: Text that does not stand out enough from its background is hard to read for many visitors, and fails accessibility guidelines Google checks.

### 3. [MEDIUM] Click activity may be invisible inside the Facebook in-app browser
Category: Tracking
Why it matters: Patterns on this page (14 custom-element tags) tend to suppress click events inside Android Webview and iOS in-app browsers. Visitors arriving from Meta ads may register as zero-interaction sessions even when they're actively using the page. Add a server-side landing tracker so you don't lose that audience entirely.

### 4. [LOW] Unused JavaScript is being downloaded
Category: Performance
Why it matters: Code that never runs on this page still costs download and parse time on every visit. Splitting or removing it speeds up load. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 131 KiB.

### 5. [LOW] The page loads from a lot of third-party services
Why it matters: Around 12 separate outside domains load on this page (analytics, ads, chat widgets, fonts). Each one is a connection that can be slow, fail, or change behavior outside your control.
How we know: median across loads

### 6. [LOW] Search-result title is leaving room on the table
Category: SEO
Why it matters: Google gives you about 60 characters of headline space in search results. This page is using 18. Adding the value proposition or a relevant keyword gives someone one more reason to click.

### 7. [LOW] No third-party analytics tag detected
Category: Tracking
Why it matters: No Google Analytics, GA4, or other third-party analytics tag was found in the page. If you rely only on platform or server-side analytics that is fine; but if not, a third-party tag is the baseline way to see how many visitors arrive, where they come from, and what converts. First-party or server-side analytics are not detectable from the outside, so this may already be handled.

### 8. [LOW] Social share image declared over insecure HTTP
Category: SEO
Why it matters: The Open Graph image is declared as an http:// URL, but the page also declares og:image:secure_url over https, and the big platforms (Facebook, LinkedIn, iMessage) use that fallback, so previews render. Strict scrapers and some AI crawlers only read og:image, though, and may skip the image. Hygiene fix: declare the https URL in og:image itself.

### 9. [LOW] Security headers are missing or weak
Category: Security
Why it matters: The server response is missing browser-hardening headers that protect visitors and are a standard security and agency checklist item. Missing or weak here: a stronger HSTS policy (max-age at least 180 days plus includeSubDomains). These are set at the server, CDN, or host level (most platforms expose them in settings or a config file) and do not change how the site looks or performs.

### 10. [LOW] Some text is too small to read on phones
Affects: mobile only
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Conversion
Why it matters: 10 chunks of text come in under 12 pixels on this page. Most visitors don't zoom, they just skim past anything that small. Bumping the smallest body text to 14 pixels makes the page read without effort.
How we know: median across loads

## How to respond
Work through the issues in order. For each one give me the specific change that fixes it: real code or real copy, not advice. Keep changes minimal and match the existing style of the site.
Where several issues share one root cause, say so and fix it once rather than patching each symptom.
If an issue cannot be fixed without seeing more of the code, say exactly which file or selector you need instead of guessing.
10 findings, ready to paste

02Performance: phone, desktop, and real visitors

MetricMobileDesktopRead
TTFB (lab median)23 ms20 msLab
FCP (lab median)216 ms208 msLab
LCP (lab median)402 ms346 msGood
Page weight (median)1.9 MB1.9 MBOK

Google Lighthouse (lab): Performance 85 mobile / 94 desktop, SEO 100, Accessibility 97, Best Practices 96.

Lab numbers are from a headless mobile browser on an unthrottled connection: treat them as a floor, not a typical experience. Add a Google API key to light up real-user field data (CrUX) and Lighthouse scores.

03Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile

6 of 51 tappable items on this page come in below the platform minimums for reliable tapping on a phone (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp; WCAG 2.5.8 sets 24px as the hard accessibility floor). The same ones came up small on every one of the 4 test loads, so this is the page itself, not a fluke.

When customers can't tap what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave. They don't file a bug. They don't try again. They just leave. A desktop dashboard can't see this because it's the difference between a thumb and a cursor.

The buttons measuring below the minimum on this scan:

  • a 172x17 "Calm and Correct Duo"
  • a 172x17 "Dew It All Essence"
  • a 172x17 "Hydrate and Elevate Duo"
  • a 172x17 "Prime, Plump, Power Trio"
  • a 106x11 "Habitude Lifestyle"
  • a 115x11 "Powered by Shopify"

The fix is CSS-only on most sites: add padding around the icon (don't just change the icon size) so the actual tap area is at least 44×44 pixels. No redesign, no new assets.

04Technical SEO & structured data

CheckResult
TitleHabitude Lifestyle (18 chars)
Meta description201 chars
H11 on page
CanonicalPresent
Structured data (JSON-LD)Organization, WebSite
Open GraphTitle + image

05The fix checklist

Everything to fix, priority first, each tagged with the screen it affects and a rough effort. Work top to bottom.

  1. Unused JavaScript is being downloadedBothVaries
  2. The page loads from a lot of third-party servicesBothDev afternoon
  3. Add quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothVaries
  4. Search-result title is leaving room on the tableBoth1 line
  5. No third-party analytics tag detectedBothDev afternoon
  6. Social share image declared over insecure HTTPBothVaries
  7. Click activity may be invisible inside the Facebook in-app browserBothVaries
  8. Some text is low-contrast and hard to readBothVaries
  9. Security headers are missing or weakBothVaries
  10. Some text is too small to read on phonesMobileCSS only

Effort is a rough read from the outside: "CSS only" means no new assets or backend work, "1 line" means a single tag, "Dev afternoon" means a developer needs to touch tracking or scripts.

06What this report cannot tell you

Everything above is from the outside, looking at the page on a simulated phone and desktop. The questions that actually decide revenue need real visitors. Install the Harvv pixel (one script tag, 16 KB, zero personal data, no engineering project) and within about 72 hours you'd know which buttons real customers tapped and missed, how often Google Analytics is missing visits, and exactly where mobile shoppers stalled and left. This report shows you where to look. The pixel shows you how often it happens, and to whom.

What to do next
See this same depth on your real visitors, every day.

Drop the Harvv pixel on habitude.ph and we turn this one-off scan into ongoing measured behavior: which taps miss, where sessions stall, and the real drop rates. Free to start, no card needed.

Add the pixel free

07How we did this, and what it can't prove

  • 4 mobile + 2 desktop loads of one URL from headless Chrome (iPhone viewport at 390px, desktop at 1366px), August 31, 2026. Enough loads to separate real defects from random noise, not a full-site crawl.
  • Lab numbers, not real-user numbers (no field data was available for this run). Real devices on real networks run slower.
  • Friction is inferred, not counted. We can prove a button is small. We can't, from the outside, count how often it causes a missed tap. That requires the pixel on a live page.
  • This page rotates its content load to load, which is on its own a reason a single-shot scan can't be the last word on it.

About Harvv, the source of this teardown

Harvv is a behavioral UX analytics platform (harvv.com). A lightweight JavaScript pixel captures how real visitors behave on a site (dead clicks, rage clicks, scroll depth, Core Web Vitals, JavaScript errors, and 50+ other signals) and the engine turns them into prioritized, plain-English findings. This teardown is the outside-in version of that: the same detectors run against a public page, with no pixel installed.

How to read it. Every finding here is a reproducible, automated measurement, not an opinion: element sizes, contrast ratios, load metrics, and structured-data checks that anyone can re-run against the same URL. The method is stated in full above. Automated testing catches a subset of issues, so this is a starting point, not a certification.

Full disclosure. Harvv makes the pixel that would measure the friction these findings imply, so we have a commercial interest. That is exactly why the findings are kept to things a reader can verify independently, and why nothing here is inflated: an unreproducible claim would undermine the tool it is meant to demonstrate.

Prepared by Harvv (harvv.com), a behavioral UX analytics platform. Last updated August 31, 2026.

Related teardowns

McMaster-Carr
Behavioral teardown
Austincapitalmortgage
Behavioral teardown
Par Pacific
Behavioral teardown
Valero
Behavioral teardown

See all site teardowns →

harvv://this-page live
Scroll depth how far you read0%
Dead clicks clicks that did nothing0
Rage clicks frustration bursts0
Interactions clicks that worked0
event log · live