Site teardown · Eco Host
eco-host.net
Site health · August 15, 2026
Prepared by Harvv

What your site is actually doing.

One page: what is working, what is costing you visitors, and what to fix next. A phone-and-desktop teardown of the live site: 4 phone loads + 2 desktop loads. No login, no insider access, no Harvv pixel needed. The full evidence is at the bottom.

August 15, 2026·External scan·4 mobile + 2 desktop loads · no pixel data·Download as PDF

Working

What's already working. These held up across every load.

1.8s

Speed is good.

0.1MB

The page is about 0.1 MB across 53 requests. That keeps it quick on mobile data and cheap to load repeatedly.

91/100

Lighthouse scores SEO 91/100. The fundamentals Google looks for are present.

Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

Costing you

Ranked by what hurts conversion most. Full evidence below.

4

4 form fields have no label

cvr

JavaScript errors were logged during load

41%

Add quotations so AI engines cite this page

fix

Security headers are missing or weak

43/43

Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)

link

No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's ranking

Fixing next
image sizes, the canonical and tiny text.

3 small changes, on the pages people actually land on: Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now); No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's ranking; Some text is too small to read on phones. We re-measure the same samples after.

3
hours
AI search visibility
How visible is eco-host.net to AI search?
ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews are the new front page. The AI checks in this report are a preview. A free account turns them into a live 0 to 100 score, tracked daily and benchmarked against your competitors.
See the full AI report, free

01Findings, ranked by what hurts conversion most

SeverityFindingHow we know
High4 form fields have no labelBothAccessibility (WCAG)ConversionTracking
Screen readers can't announce these fields, and a sighted user who clears the placeholder can't recover the prompt. Wrap each input in <label>…</label> or add aria-label.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
HighJavaScript errors were logged during loadBothConversionTracking
Errors in the console often mean a feature silently broke: a button that does nothing, analytics that did not fire, a form that will not submit.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
HighAdd quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothAI SearchSEO
Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 1 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumSecurity headers are missing or weakBothSecurity
The server response is missing browser-hardening headers that protect visitors and are a standard security and agency checklist item. Missing or weak here: Content-Security-Policy (the main defense against injected and cross-site scripts); clickjacking protection (X-Frame-Options or a CSP frame-ancestors rule); HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security, which forces HTTPS on return visits). These are set at the server, CDN, or host level (most platforms expose them in settings or a config file) and do not change how the site looks or performs.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowImages have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothPerformanceSEO
43 of 43 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's rankingBoth
When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs (think tracking parameters or session IDs), Google can split your ranking signal across them. A single canonical tag tells Google which version counts.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowSome text is too small to read on phonesMobileAccessibility (WCAG)Conversion
12 chunks of text come in under 12 pixels on this page. Most visitors don't zoom, they just skim past anything that small. Bumping the smallest body text to 14 pixels makes the page read without effort.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
median across loads
LowLinks to this page will look bare when sharedBoth
The page is missing its Open Graph title and image, so when someone shares it on Facebook, LinkedIn, iMessage, or Slack the preview has no title and image. A flat grey link gets far fewer clicks than one with an image and headline.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo structured data for rich search resultsBoth
The page has no schema.org markup. Adding the right type (Product, Article, Organization, FAQ) lets Google show rich results like star ratings and prices, which lift click-through for free.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowThere is very little text on this pageBoth
The page has about 46 words. Thin pages give Google little to rank on and visitors little to act on. If this is a key landing page, it usually needs more substance.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo third-party analytics tag detectedBothTracking
No Google Analytics, GA4, or other third-party analytics tag was found in the page. If you rely only on platform or server-side analytics that is fine; but if not, a third-party tag is the baseline way to see how many visitors arrive, where they come from, and what converts. First-party or server-side analytics are not detectable from the outside, so this may already be handled.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo email capture or newsletter detectedBothConversion
No email-marketing tag (Klaviyo, Mailchimp, etc.) was found. If capturing visitors is relevant to this site, an email signup builds an owned audience you keep regardless of ad costs. Not every site needs one.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo visible contact details (email or phone)BothConversion
The page exposes no email or phone link. For higher-value or trust-sensitive purchases, a clear way to reach a human reduces hesitation. Add an email or phone link in the header or footer.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowUnused CSS is being downloadedBothPerformance
Style rules that this page never uses still block rendering while they download. Trimming them frees the paint path. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 11 KiB.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowThe page is heavy to downloadBothPerformance
Total page weight is high. On a phone with patchy data, that is extra seconds of blank screen before the page is usable. Lighthouse measured: Total size was 4,097 KiB.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowSitemap not listed in robots.txtBoth
A sitemap exists but is not referenced in robots.txt. Adding a "Sitemap:" line to robots.txt helps crawlers find it reliably.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT

Accessibility findings are automated checks against Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 and 2.2. They flag potential barriers and legal risk, not a certification or a determination of compliance with the ADA, Section 508, or EN 301 549. Automated testing catches only a subset of issues; a full conformance review needs manual and assistive-technology testing by a qualified reviewer.

From finding to fix
Want the fix, not just the finding?
Install Harvv and we turn each issue above into a ready-to-paste prompt for your AI coding assistant. Drop it into Cursor, Claude, or Copilot and the diagnosis becomes a concrete code change, written against this exact page.
Get the fix prompts

"How we know": unlabeled = a deterministic fact, identical on every load (e.g. element sizes). Most findings are this kind, so we only mark the exceptions: median across loads = a noisy lab metric, reported as a median. real-user field data = Google CrUX, actual Chrome visitors.

Structural and AI-search checks crawl up to 8 pages from your sitemap (a sample, not your full site). "Broken" means a link returned 404, 410, or 5xx, or did not respond; access-controlled pages (401, 403) are not counted.

01bTake the whole report to your AI

Every finding above in one payload, with the reasoning behind each one. The prompt is written to be pasted into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT. The JSON is for piping into your own tooling.

Includes the site context, what is already working (so your assistant does not "fix" it), and every finding with its severity, evidence, and why it matters.
Audit of https://eco-host.net/, run August 15, 2026. 16 issues were found. I want them fixed.

## Context
- Site: https://eco-host.net/
- Mobile LCP (lab median): 1798 ms
- Desktop LCP (lab median): 1736 ms
- Page weight (median): 0.1 MB
- Tap targets under 44px: 0% (0 of 15)
- Evidence base: 4 mobile + 2 desktop loads

## Already working, do not change these
- Speed is good: The main content paints in about 1.8s in our test loads, inside Google's 2.5s "good" threshold. Real networks are slower, but the page itself is not heavy.
- Light page weight: The page is about 0.1 MB across 53 requests. That keeps it quick on mobile data and cheap to load repeatedly.
- Search basics are in place: Lighthouse scores SEO 91/100. The fundamentals Google looks for are present.
- Layout holds on phone and desktop: Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

## Issues, most damaging first

### 1. [HIGH] 4 form fields have no label
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Conversion, Tracking
Why it matters: Screen readers can't announce these fields, and a sighted user who clears the placeholder can't recover the prompt. Wrap each input in <label>…</label> or add aria-label.
Exact elements found: (input) placeholder="Your name", (input) placeholder="Username", (input) placeholder="Password (8+ characters)", (input) placeholder="Confirm password"

### 2. [HIGH] JavaScript errors were logged during load
Category: Conversion, Tracking
Why it matters: Errors in the console often mean a feature silently broke: a button that does nothing, analytics that did not fire, a form that will not submit.

### 3. [HIGH] Add quotations so AI engines cite this page
Category: AI Search, SEO
Why it matters: Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 1 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)

### 4. [MEDIUM] Security headers are missing or weak
Category: Security
Why it matters: The server response is missing browser-hardening headers that protect visitors and are a standard security and agency checklist item. Missing or weak here: Content-Security-Policy (the main defense against injected and cross-site scripts); clickjacking protection (X-Frame-Options or a CSP frame-ancestors rule); HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security, which forces HTTPS on return visits). These are set at the server, CDN, or host level (most platforms expose them in settings or a config file) and do not change how the site looks or performs.

### 5. [LOW] Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)
Category: Performance, SEO
Why it matters: 43 of 43 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift.
Exact elements found: WkKAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC, GHwnIAAAAASUVORK5CYII=, oldIPbHkuzoAAAAASUVORK5CYII=, w7wBaD2r+djT4eOalc6jbWXKOnNPPxOOzdX8jnnjiiSeeeOKJJ554LtP5G6CQd6bnVmo5AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC, fyXt7Le3kv7+W9vovrv0qBIN9WcPdYAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC, wGT5BAIisg3vgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==

### 6. [LOW] No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's ranking
Why it matters: When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs (think tracking parameters or session IDs), Google can split your ranking signal across them. A single canonical tag tells Google which version counts.

### 7. [LOW] Some text is too small to read on phones
Affects: mobile only
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Conversion
Why it matters: 12 chunks of text come in under 12 pixels on this page. Most visitors don't zoom, they just skim past anything that small. Bumping the smallest body text to 14 pixels makes the page read without effort.
How we know: median across loads

### 8. [LOW] Links to this page will look bare when shared
Why it matters: The page is missing its Open Graph title and image, so when someone shares it on Facebook, LinkedIn, iMessage, or Slack the preview has no title and image. A flat grey link gets far fewer clicks than one with an image and headline.

### 9. [LOW] No structured data for rich search results
Why it matters: The page has no schema.org markup. Adding the right type (Product, Article, Organization, FAQ) lets Google show rich results like star ratings and prices, which lift click-through for free.

### 10. [LOW] There is very little text on this page
Why it matters: The page has about 46 words. Thin pages give Google little to rank on and visitors little to act on. If this is a key landing page, it usually needs more substance.

### 11. [LOW] No third-party analytics tag detected
Category: Tracking
Why it matters: No Google Analytics, GA4, or other third-party analytics tag was found in the page. If you rely only on platform or server-side analytics that is fine; but if not, a third-party tag is the baseline way to see how many visitors arrive, where they come from, and what converts. First-party or server-side analytics are not detectable from the outside, so this may already be handled.

### 12. [LOW] No email capture or newsletter detected
Category: Conversion
Why it matters: No email-marketing tag (Klaviyo, Mailchimp, etc.) was found. If capturing visitors is relevant to this site, an email signup builds an owned audience you keep regardless of ad costs. Not every site needs one.

### 13. [LOW] No visible contact details (email or phone)
Category: Conversion
Why it matters: The page exposes no email or phone link. For higher-value or trust-sensitive purchases, a clear way to reach a human reduces hesitation. Add an email or phone link in the header or footer.

### 14. [LOW] Unused CSS is being downloaded
Category: Performance
Why it matters: Style rules that this page never uses still block rendering while they download. Trimming them frees the paint path. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 11 KiB.

### 15. [LOW] The page is heavy to download
Category: Performance
Why it matters: Total page weight is high. On a phone with patchy data, that is extra seconds of blank screen before the page is usable. Lighthouse measured: Total size was 4,097 KiB.

### 16. [LOW] Sitemap not listed in robots.txt
Why it matters: A sitemap exists but is not referenced in robots.txt. Adding a "Sitemap:" line to robots.txt helps crawlers find it reliably.

## How to respond
Work through the issues in order. For each one give me the specific change that fixes it: real code or real copy, not advice. Keep changes minimal and match the existing style of the site.
Where several issues share one root cause, say so and fix it once rather than patching each symptom.
If an issue cannot be fixed without seeing more of the code, say exactly which file or selector you need instead of guessing.
16 findings, ready to paste

02Performance: phone, desktop, and real visitors

MetricMobileDesktopRead
TTFB (lab median)43 ms46 msLab
FCP (lab median)246 ms228 msLab
LCP (lab median)1.8s1.7sGood
Page weight (median)0.1 MB0.1 MBOK

Google Lighthouse (lab): Performance 43 mobile / 57 desktop, SEO 91, Accessibility 93, Best Practices 96.

Lab numbers are from a headless mobile browser on an unthrottled connection: treat them as a floor, not a typical experience. Add a Google API key to light up real-user field data (CrUX) and Lighthouse scores.

03Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile

0 of 15 tappable items on this page come in below 44×44 pixels, the size Apple and Google both recommend for reliable tapping on a phone. The same ones came up small on every one of the 4 test loads, so this is the page itself, not a fluke.

When customers can't tap what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave. They don't file a bug. They don't try again. They just leave. A desktop dashboard can't see this because it's the difference between a thumb and a cursor.

The fix is CSS-only on most sites: add padding around the icon (don't just change the icon size) so the actual tap area is at least 44×44 pixels. No redesign, no new assets.

04Technical SEO & structured data

CheckResult
TitleEco — Recycle. Earn. Level Up. (30 chars)
Meta description109 chars
H11 on page
CanonicalMissing
Structured data (JSON-LD)None
Open GraphIncomplete

05The fix checklist

Everything to fix, priority first, each tagged with the screen it affects and a rough effort. Work top to bottom.

  1. JavaScript errors were logged during loadBothDev afternoon
  2. Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothCSS only
  3. Unused CSS is being downloadedBothVaries
  4. The page is heavy to downloadBothSmall
  5. 4 form fields have no labelBothVaries
  6. No email capture or newsletter detectedBothVaries
  7. No visible contact details (email or phone)BothVaries
  8. Add quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothVaries
  9. No third-party analytics tag detectedBothDev afternoon
  10. No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's rankingBoth1 line
  11. Links to this page will look bare when sharedBoth1 line
  12. No structured data for rich search resultsBothVaries
  13. There is very little text on this pageBothVaries
  14. Sitemap not listed in robots.txtBothVaries
  15. Security headers are missing or weakBothVaries
  16. Some text is too small to read on phonesMobileCSS only

Effort is a rough read from the outside: "CSS only" means no new assets or backend work, "1 line" means a single tag, "Dev afternoon" means a developer needs to touch tracking or scripts.

06What this report cannot tell you

Everything above is from the outside, looking at the page on a simulated phone and desktop. The questions that actually decide revenue need real visitors. Install the Harvv pixel (one script tag, 16 KB, zero personal data, no engineering project) and within about 72 hours you'd know which buttons real customers tapped and missed, how often Google Analytics is missing visits, and exactly where mobile shoppers stalled and left. This report shows you where to look. The pixel shows you how often it happens, and to whom.

What to do next
See this same depth on your real visitors, every day.

Drop the Harvv pixel on eco-host.net and we turn this one-off scan into ongoing measured behavior: which taps miss, where sessions stall, and the real drop rates. Free to start, no card needed.

Add the pixel free

07How we did this, and what it can't prove

  • 4 mobile + 2 desktop loads of one URL from headless Chrome (iPhone viewport at 390px, desktop at 1366px), August 15, 2026. Enough loads to separate real defects from random noise, not a full-site crawl.
  • Lab numbers, not real-user numbers (no field data was available for this run). Real devices on real networks run slower.
  • Friction is inferred, not counted. We can prove a button is small. We can't, from the outside, count how often it causes a missed tap. That requires the pixel on a live page.

About Harvv, the source of this teardown

Harvv is a behavioral UX analytics platform (harvv.com). A lightweight JavaScript pixel captures how real visitors behave on a site (dead clicks, rage clicks, scroll depth, Core Web Vitals, JavaScript errors, and 50+ other signals) and the engine turns them into prioritized, plain-English findings. This teardown is the outside-in version of that: the same detectors run against a public page, with no pixel installed.

How to read it. Every finding here is a reproducible, automated measurement, not an opinion: element sizes, contrast ratios, load metrics, and structured-data checks that anyone can re-run against the same URL. The method is stated in full above. Automated testing catches a subset of issues, so this is a starting point, not a certification.

Full disclosure. Harvv makes the pixel that would measure the friction these findings imply, so we have a commercial interest. That is exactly why the findings are kept to things a reader can verify independently, and why nothing here is inflated: an unreproducible claim would undermine the tool it is meant to demonstrate.

Prepared by Harvv (harvv.com), a behavioral UX analytics platform. Last updated August 15, 2026.

Related teardowns

Vibhinngautam
Behavioral teardown
Forgeyourpathai
Behavioral teardown
Ysdev Ca
Behavioral teardown
Seoloupe
Behavioral teardown

See all site teardowns →

harvv://this-page live
Scroll depth how far you read0%
Dead clicks clicks that did nothing0
Rage clicks frustration bursts0
Interactions clicks that worked0
event log · live