Site teardown · Seoloupe
seoloupe.com
Site health · August 9, 2026
Prepared by Harvv

What your site is actually doing.

One page: what is working, what is costing you visitors, and what to fix next. A phone-and-desktop teardown of the live site: 4 phone loads + 2 desktop loads, cross-checked against real Chrome users from Google's field data. No login, no insider access, no Harvv pixel needed. The full evidence is at the bottom.

August 9, 2026·External scan + real-user field data·4 mobile + 2 desktop loads + Google CrUX·Download as PDF

Working

What's already working. These held up across every load.

1.2s

Speed is good.

0.6MB

The page is about 0.6 MB across 26 requests. That keeps it quick on mobile data and cheap to load repeatedly.

0.00

Layout stays put as it loads.

0

No JavaScript errors on load.

100/100

Lighthouse scores SEO 100/100. The fundamentals Google looks for are present.

Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

Costing you

Ranked by what hurts conversion most. Full evidence below.

4

Google Analytics tracking broken

3

3 form fields have no label

faint

Some text is low-contrast and hard to read

41%

Add quotations so AI engines cite this page

22/70

Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile

15

Click activity may be invisible inside the Facebook in-app browser

Fixing next
tap targets and image sizes.

2 small changes, on the pages people actually land on: Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile; Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now). We re-measure the same samples after.

2
hours
AI search visibility
How visible is seoloupe.com to AI search?
ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews are the new front page. The AI checks in this report are a preview. A free account turns them into a live 0 to 100 score, tracked daily and benchmarked against your competitors.
See the full AI report, free

01Findings, ranked by what hurts conversion most

SeverityFindingHow we know
HighGoogle Analytics tracking brokenBoth
The Google Analytics request failed to complete on every one of the 4 test loads. If real visitors hit the same failure, GA is missing those visits and the dashboard has no way to flag it. Conversion numbers, audience counts, and channel attribution are all undercounting. Worth checking the tag loading order and any consent banner that might be blocking the request.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
High3 form fields have no labelBothAccessibility (WCAG)ConversionTracking
Screen readers can't announce these fields, and a sighted user who clears the placeholder can't recover the prompt. Wrap each input in <label>…</label> or add aria-label.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
HighSome text is low-contrast and hard to readBothAccessibility (WCAG)
Text that does not stand out enough from its background is hard to read for many visitors, and fails accessibility guidelines Google checks.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
HighAdd quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothAI SearchSEO
Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 8 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumTiny buttons are hard to tap on mobileMobileAccessibility (WCAG)Conversion
22 of 70 tappable items on this page (31%) measure under 24 pixels on their shorter side, below the WCAG minimum, and well under the 44 pixels Apple and Google recommend for reliable tapping, and the same ones came up small on every test load. When visitors can't hit what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave instead of trying again.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumClick activity may be invisible inside the Facebook in-app browserBothTracking
Patterns on this page (15 inline onclick handlers) tend to suppress click events inside Android Webview and iOS in-app browsers. Visitors arriving from Meta ads may register as zero-interaction sessions even when they're actively using the page. Add a server-side landing tracker so you don't lose that audience entirely.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
Medium15 interactive elements have no stable, accessible identityBothAccessibility (WCAG)Tracking
These elements are clicked like buttons but expose no accessible name, or are a plain div/span used as a control with no role. Assistive tech announces only a role (or nothing), and analytics and heatmaps have no human-readable label or stable selector to bind the click to, so the click is both inaccessible and untrackable, and any redesign silently breaks click aggregation. Give each one a real <button>/<a>, an aria-label, and a stable id or data-attribute.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowImages have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothPerformanceSEO
48 of 49 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0.00, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo advertising pixel detectedBothTracking
Analytics is present but no Meta/Google/TikTok ad pixel was found. If you run paid ads, conversion tracking should be installed before the next campaign so the platforms can optimize toward buyers, not clicks.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo email capture or newsletter detectedBothConversion
No email-marketing tag (Klaviyo, Mailchimp, etc.) was found. If capturing visitors is relevant to this site, an email signup builds an owned audience you keep regardless of ad costs. Not every site needs one.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowUnused JavaScript is being downloadedBothPerformance
Code that never runs on this page still costs download and parse time on every visit. Splitting or removing it speeds up load. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 75 KiB.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowUnused CSS is being downloadedBothPerformance
Style rules that this page never uses still block rendering while they download. Trimming them frees the paint path. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 30 KiB.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT

Accessibility findings are automated checks against Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 and 2.2. They flag potential barriers and legal risk, not a certification or a determination of compliance with the ADA, Section 508, or EN 301 549. Automated testing catches only a subset of issues; a full conformance review needs manual and assistive-technology testing by a qualified reviewer.

From finding to fix
Want the fix, not just the finding?
Install Harvv and we turn each issue above into a ready-to-paste prompt for your AI coding assistant. Drop it into Cursor, Claude, or Copilot and the diagnosis becomes a concrete code change, written against this exact page.
Get the fix prompts

"How we know": unlabeled = a deterministic fact, identical on every load (e.g. element sizes). Most findings are this kind, so we only mark the exceptions: median across loads = a noisy lab metric, reported as a median. real-user field data = Google CrUX, actual Chrome visitors.

Structural and AI-search checks crawl up to 8 pages from your sitemap (a sample, not your full site). "Broken" means a link returned 404, 410, or 5xx, or did not respond; access-controlled pages (401, 403) are not counted.

01bTake the whole report to your AI

Every finding above in one payload, with the reasoning behind each one. The prompt is written to be pasted into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT. The JSON is for piping into your own tooling.

Includes the site context, what is already working (so your assistant does not "fix" it), and every finding with its severity, evidence, and why it matters.
Audit of https://www.seoloupe.com/, run August 9, 2026. 12 issues were found. I want them fixed.

## Context
- Site: https://www.seoloupe.com/
- Mobile LCP (lab median): 158 ms
- Desktop LCP (lab median): 174 ms
- Page weight (median): 0.6 MB
- Tap targets under 44px: 31% (22 of 70)
- Evidence base: 4 mobile + 2 desktop loads + Google CrUX field data

## Already working, do not change these
- Speed is good: Real Chrome visitors see the main content in 1.2s (Google's "good" bar is 2.5s). This is field data from actual users, not a lab guess.
- Light page weight: The page is about 0.6 MB across 26 requests. That keeps it quick on mobile data and cheap to load repeatedly.
- Layout stays put as it loads: Real visitors see only 0.00 of layout shift (good is under 0.10), so the page is not jumping under their finger.
- No JavaScript errors on load: Nothing threw a script error across the test loads, so buttons and tracking are not silently breaking mid-session.
- Search basics are in place: Lighthouse scores SEO 100/100. The fundamentals Google looks for are present.
- Layout holds on phone and desktop: Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

## Issues, most damaging first

### 1. [HIGH] Google Analytics tracking broken
Why it matters: The Google Analytics request failed to complete on every one of the 4 test loads. If real visitors hit the same failure, GA is missing those visits and the dashboard has no way to flag it. Conversion numbers, audience counts, and channel attribution are all undercounting. Worth checking the tag loading order and any consent banner that might be blocking the request.

### 2. [HIGH] 3 form fields have no label
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Conversion, Tracking
Why it matters: Screen readers can't announce these fields, and a sighted user who clears the placeholder can't recover the prompt. Wrap each input in <label>…</label> or add aria-label.
Exact elements found: (input) placeholder="website.com (Optional)", (input) placeholder="website.com (Optional)", (input) placeholder="website.com (Optional)"

### 3. [HIGH] Some text is low-contrast and hard to read
Category: Accessibility (WCAG)
Why it matters: Text that does not stand out enough from its background is hard to read for many visitors, and fails accessibility guidelines Google checks.

### 4. [HIGH] Add quotations so AI engines cite this page
Category: AI Search, SEO
Why it matters: Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 8 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)

### 5. [MEDIUM] Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile
Affects: mobile only
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Conversion
Why it matters: 22 of 70 tappable items on this page (31%) measure under 24 pixels on their shorter side, below the WCAG minimum, and well under the 44 pixels Apple and Google recommend for reliable tapping, and the same ones came up small on every test load. When visitors can't hit what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave instead of trying again.
Exact elements found: a 130x17 "SeoLoupe Logo", a 330x17 "Buy Once", a 330x17 "Upgrade", a 330x17 "Upgrade", a 150x17 "SeoLoupe Logo", a 105x17 "Features", a 105x17 "How it Works", a 105x17 "Pricing"

### 6. [MEDIUM] Click activity may be invisible inside the Facebook in-app browser
Category: Tracking
Why it matters: Patterns on this page (15 inline onclick handlers) tend to suppress click events inside Android Webview and iOS in-app browsers. Visitors arriving from Meta ads may register as zero-interaction sessions even when they're actively using the page. Add a server-side landing tracker so you don't lose that audience entirely.

### 7. [MEDIUM] 15 interactive elements have no stable, accessible identity
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Tracking
Why it matters: These elements are clicked like buttons but expose no accessible name, or are a plain div/span used as a control with no role. Assistive tech announces only a role (or nothing), and analytics and heatmaps have no human-readable label or stable selector to bind the click to, so the click is both inaccessible and untrackable, and any redesign silently breaks click aggregation. Give each one a real <button>/<a>, an aria-label, and a stable id or data-attribute.
Exact elements found: (div) (no accessible name), (div) (no accessible name), "What does this tool do?" (div) (div/span used as a button, no role), "What is GEO and AEO?" (div) (div/span used as a button, no role), "Who is this tool for?" (div) (div/span used as a button, no role), "Do I need SEO experience to use it?" (div) (div/span used as a button, no role), "How does the SEO scan work?" (div) (div/span used as a button, no role), "What makes this different from other SEO" (div) (div/span used as a button, no role)

### 8. [LOW] Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)
Category: Performance, SEO
Why it matters: 48 of 49 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0.00, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift.
Exact elements found: seoloupe_logo-removebg-preview.svg "SeoLoupe Logo", icon6.png "Google Logo", icon2.png "ChatGPT logo", icon1.png "Claude logo", google-gemini-icon.e6fb2cbeb2e04a07cea631da18183c40.svg "Gemini logo", grok-logo.png "Grok logo"

### 9. [LOW] No advertising pixel detected
Category: Tracking
Why it matters: Analytics is present but no Meta/Google/TikTok ad pixel was found. If you run paid ads, conversion tracking should be installed before the next campaign so the platforms can optimize toward buyers, not clicks.

### 10. [LOW] No email capture or newsletter detected
Category: Conversion
Why it matters: No email-marketing tag (Klaviyo, Mailchimp, etc.) was found. If capturing visitors is relevant to this site, an email signup builds an owned audience you keep regardless of ad costs. Not every site needs one.

### 11. [LOW] Unused JavaScript is being downloaded
Category: Performance
Why it matters: Code that never runs on this page still costs download and parse time on every visit. Splitting or removing it speeds up load. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 75 KiB.

### 12. [LOW] Unused CSS is being downloaded
Category: Performance
Why it matters: Style rules that this page never uses still block rendering while they download. Trimming them frees the paint path. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 30 KiB.

## How to respond
Work through the issues in order. For each one give me the specific change that fixes it: real code or real copy, not advice. Keep changes minimal and match the existing style of the site.
Where several issues share one root cause, say so and fix it once rather than patching each symptom.
If an issue cannot be fixed without seeing more of the code, say exactly which file or selector you need instead of guessing.
12 findings, ready to paste

02Performance: phone, desktop, and real visitors

MetricMobileDesktopRead
TTFB (lab median)20 ms22 msLab
FCP (lab median)158 ms174 msLab
LCP (lab median)158 ms174 msGood
Page weight (median)0.6 MB0.6 MBOK
Real LCP (p75, url)1.2 sGood
Real INP (p75)98 msGood
Real CLS (p75)0.00Good

Google Lighthouse (lab): Performance 67 mobile / 99 desktop, SEO 100, Accessibility 88, Best Practices 100.

Lab numbers are from a headless mobile browser on an unthrottled connection: treat them as a floor, not a typical experience.

03Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile

22 of 70 tappable items on this page come in below 44×44 pixels, the size Apple and Google both recommend for reliable tapping on a phone. The same ones came up small on every one of the 4 test loads, so this is the page itself, not a fluke.

When customers can't tap what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave. They don't file a bug. They don't try again. They just leave. A desktop dashboard can't see this because it's the difference between a thumb and a cursor.

The buttons measuring below the minimum on this scan:

  • a 130x17 "SeoLoupe Logo"
  • a 330x17 "Buy Once"
  • a 330x17 "Upgrade"
  • a 330x17 "Upgrade"
  • a 150x17 "SeoLoupe Logo"
  • a 105x17 "Features"
  • a 105x17 "How it Works"
  • a 105x17 "Pricing"

The fix is CSS-only on most sites: add padding around the icon (don't just change the icon size) so the actual tap area is at least 44×44 pixels. No redesign, no new assets.

04Technical SEO & structured data

CheckResult
TitleSeoLoupe - SEO, GEO & AEO Audit Tool That Shows You What to Fix (63 chars)
Meta description149 chars
H11 on page
CanonicalPresent
Structured data (JSON-LD)1 block(s)
Open GraphTitle + image

05The fix checklist

Everything to fix, priority first, each tagged with the screen it affects and a rough effort. Work top to bottom.

  1. Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobileMobileCSS only
  2. Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothCSS only
  3. Unused JavaScript is being downloadedBothVaries
  4. Unused CSS is being downloadedBothVaries
  5. 3 form fields have no labelBothVaries
  6. No email capture or newsletter detectedBothVaries
  7. Add quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothVaries
  8. No advertising pixel detectedBothDev afternoon
  9. Google Analytics tracking brokenBothDev afternoon
  10. Click activity may be invisible inside the Facebook in-app browserBothVaries
  11. Some text is low-contrast and hard to readBothVaries
  12. 15 interactive elements have no stable, accessible identityBothDev afternoon

Effort is a rough read from the outside: "CSS only" means no new assets or backend work, "1 line" means a single tag, "Dev afternoon" means a developer needs to touch tracking or scripts.

06What this report cannot tell you

Everything above is from the outside, looking at the page on a simulated phone and desktop. The questions that actually decide revenue need real visitors. Install the Harvv pixel (one script tag, 16 KB, zero personal data, no engineering project) and within about 72 hours you'd know which buttons real customers tapped and missed, how often Google Analytics is missing visits, and exactly where mobile shoppers stalled and left. This report shows you where to look. The pixel shows you how often it happens, and to whom.

What to do next
See this same depth on your real visitors, every day.

Drop the Harvv pixel on seoloupe.com and we turn this one-off scan into ongoing measured behavior: which taps miss, where sessions stall, and the real drop rates. Free to start, no card needed.

Add the pixel free

07How we did this, and what it can't prove

  • 4 mobile + 2 desktop loads of one URL from headless Chrome (iPhone viewport at 390px, desktop at 1366px), August 9, 2026. Enough loads to separate real defects from random noise, not a full-site crawl.
  • Lab numbers, not real-user numbers, except the CrUX rows, which are real Chrome users. Real devices on real networks run slower.
  • Friction is inferred, not counted. We can prove a button is small. We can't, from the outside, count how often it causes a missed tap. That requires the pixel on a live page.

About Harvv, the source of this teardown

Harvv is a behavioral UX analytics platform (harvv.com). A lightweight JavaScript pixel captures how real visitors behave on a site (dead clicks, rage clicks, scroll depth, Core Web Vitals, JavaScript errors, and 50+ other signals) and the engine turns them into prioritized, plain-English findings. This teardown is the outside-in version of that: the same detectors run against a public page, with no pixel installed.

How to read it. Every finding here is a reproducible, automated measurement, not an opinion: element sizes, contrast ratios, load metrics, and structured-data checks that anyone can re-run against the same URL. The method is stated in full above. Automated testing catches a subset of issues, so this is a starting point, not a certification.

Full disclosure. Harvv makes the pixel that would measure the friction these findings imply, so we have a commercial interest. That is exactly why the findings are kept to things a reader can verify independently, and why nothing here is inflated: an unreproducible claim would undermine the tool it is meant to demonstrate.

Prepared by Harvv (harvv.com), a behavioral UX analytics platform. Last updated August 9, 2026.

Related teardowns

Aerthom
Behavioral teardown
Invincibowl
Behavioral teardown
Mihirnaik
Behavioral teardown
Pornhub
Behavioral teardown

See all site teardowns →

harvv://this-page live
Scroll depth how far you read0%
Dead clicks clicks that did nothing0
Rage clicks frustration bursts0
Interactions clicks that worked0
event log · live