Site teardown · Hazybot
hazybot.net
Site health · August 28, 2026
Prepared by Harvv

What your site is actually doing.

One page: what is working, what is costing you visitors, and what to fix next. A phone-and-desktop teardown of the live site: 4 phone loads + 2 desktop loads. No login, no insider access, no Harvv pixel needed. The full evidence is at the bottom.

August 28, 2026·External scan·4 mobile + 2 desktop loads · no pixel data·Download as PDF

Working

What's already working. These held up across every load.

0.3s

Speed is good.

0

No JavaScript errors on load.

92/100

Lighthouse scores SEO 92/100. The fundamentals Google looks for are present.

✓

Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

Costing you

Ranked by what hurts conversion most. Full evidence below.

10/20

Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile

41%

Add quotations so AI engines cite this page

faint

Some text is low-contrast and hard to read

a11y

Some buttons have no accessible name

120

Google is writing your search snippet for you

fix

No XML sitemap found

Fixing next
tap targets, meta description and image sizes.

3 small changes, on the pages people actually land on: Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile; Google is writing your search snippet for you; Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now). We re-measure the same samples after.

3
hours
AI search visibility
How visible is hazybot.net to AI search?
ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews are the new front page. The AI checks in this report are a preview. A free account turns them into a live 0 to 100 score, tracked daily and benchmarked against your competitors.
See the full AI report, free

01Findings, ranked by what hurts conversion most

SeverityFindingHow we know
HighTiny buttons are hard to tap on mobileMobileAccessibility (WCAG)Conversion
10 of 20 tappable items on this page (50%) measure under 24 pixels on their shorter side, below the 24px floor WCAG 2.5.8 sets for accessibility and well under the platform minimums (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp) for reliable tapping, and the same ones came up small on every test load. When visitors can't hit what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave instead of trying again.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowImages have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothPerformanceSEO
5 of 5 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowUnused CSS is being downloadedBothPerformance
Style rules that this page never uses still block rendering while they download. Trimming them frees the paint path. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 18 KiB.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo email capture or newsletter detectedBothConversion
No email input field was found in the page, and no email-marketing tag (Klaviyo, Mailchimp, Substack, ConvertKit, Beehiiv, MailerLite, ActiveCampaign, Omnisend, Brevo, Drip or Buttondown) was detected. A form that loads after JavaScript runs, or one behind a popup or a separate page, will not be visible to this check. If capturing visitors is relevant to this site, an email signup builds an owned audience you keep regardless of ad costs. Not every site needs one.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo visible contact details (email or phone)BothConversion
This page exposes no email address, no phone link, no contact form and no link to a contact page. For higher-value or trust-sensitive purchases, a clear way to reach a human reduces hesitation. A contact route that only appears after JavaScript runs, or that lives on a page not checked here, will not be visible to this check. Add an email or phone link in the header or footer.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
HighAdd quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothAI SearchSEO
Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 1 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumGoogle is writing your search snippet for youBothSEO
This page has no meta description, so Google grabs whatever text it finds on the page and shows that under your title in search results. Usually it's not the pitch you'd write yourself. Adding a 120 to 160 character summary is one of the easier wins for search click-through.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowSearch-result title is leaving room on the tableBothSEO
Google gives you about 60 characters of headline space in search results. This page is using 4. Adding the value proposition or a relevant keyword gives someone one more reason to click.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo advertising pixel detectedBothTracking
Analytics is present but no Meta/Google/TikTok ad pixel was found. If you run paid ads, conversion tracking should be installed before the next campaign so the platforms can optimize toward buyers, not clicks.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumNo XML sitemap foundBoth
No sitemap.xml at the standard location and none listed in robots.txt. A sitemap tells search engines every page you want indexed; without it they rely on link discovery and may miss pages.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's rankingBoth
When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs (think tracking parameters or session IDs), Google can split your ranking signal across them. A single canonical tag tells Google which version counts.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo structured data for rich search resultsBoth
The page has no schema.org markup. Adding the right type (Product, Article, Organization, FAQ) lets Google show rich results like star ratings and prices, which lift click-through for free.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo llms.txt fileBothSEO
No /llms.txt. Optional: some AI tools read this file (Anthropic, Vercel, Stripe, Cloudflare and Hugging Face publish one, and AI coding assistants use it to find docs), so adding one is a cheap courtesy to them. Google has said in writing that Google Search and its AI features do not use llms.txt, so do not expect a search-ranking or AI Overviews benefit from it.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
HighSome text is low-contrast and hard to readBothAccessibility (WCAG)
Text that does not stand out enough from its background is hard to read for many visitors, and fails accessibility guidelines Google checks.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
HighSome buttons have no accessible nameBothAccessibility (WCAG)Tracking
A button with only an icon and no label is announced as "button" by screen readers, giving no idea what it does.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT

Accessibility findings are automated checks against Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 and 2.2. They flag potential barriers and legal risk, not a certification or a determination of compliance with the ADA, Section 508, or EN 301 549. Automated testing catches only a subset of issues; a full conformance review needs manual and assistive-technology testing by a qualified reviewer.

From finding to fix
Want the fix, not just the finding?
Install Harvv and we turn each issue above into a ready-to-paste prompt for your AI coding assistant. Drop it into Cursor, Claude, or Copilot and the diagnosis becomes a concrete code change, written against this exact page.
Get the fix prompts

"How we know": unlabeled = a deterministic fact, identical on every load (e.g. element sizes). Most findings are this kind, so we only mark the exceptions: median across loads = a noisy lab metric, reported as a median. real-user field data = Google CrUX, actual Chrome visitors.

Structural and AI-search checks crawl up to 8 pages from your sitemap (a sample, not your full site). "Broken" means a link returned 404, 410, or 5xx, or did not respond; access-controlled pages (401, 403) are not counted.

01bTake the whole report to your AI

Every finding above in one payload, with the reasoning behind each one. The prompt is written to be pasted into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT. The JSON is for piping into your own tooling.

Includes the site context, what is already working (so your assistant does not "fix" it), and every finding with its severity, evidence, and why it matters.
Audit of https://hazybot.net/, run August 28, 2026. 15 issues were found. I want them fixed.

## Context
- Site: https://hazybot.net/
- Mobile LCP (lab median): 342 ms
- Desktop LCP (lab median): 378 ms
- Page weight (median): 1.8 MB
- Tap targets under 44px: 50% (10 of 20)
- Evidence base: 4 mobile + 2 desktop loads

## Already working, do not change these
- Speed is good: The main content paints in about 0.3s in our test loads, inside Google's 2.5s "good" threshold. Real networks are slower, but the page itself is not heavy.
- No JavaScript errors on load: Nothing threw a script error across the test loads, so buttons and tracking are not silently breaking mid-session.
- Search basics are in place: Lighthouse scores SEO 92/100. The fundamentals Google looks for are present.
- Layout holds on phone and desktop: Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

## Issues, most damaging first

### 1. [HIGH] Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile
Affects: mobile only
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Conversion
Why it matters: 10 of 20 tappable items on this page (50%) measure under 24 pixels on their shorter side, below the 24px floor WCAG 2.5.8 sets for accessibility and well under the platform minimums (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp) for reliable tapping, and the same ones came up small on every test load. When visitors can't hit what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave instead of trying again.
Exact elements found: a 20x34 "homer GitHub", a 20x34 "Adrian GitHub", a 20x34 "Jean GitHub", a 98x24 "Commands", a 68x24 "Pricing", a 124x24 "Documentation", a 63x24 "Terms", a 71x24 "Privacy"

### 2. [HIGH] Add quotations so AI engines cite this page
Category: AI Search, SEO
Why it matters: Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 1 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)

### 3. [HIGH] Some text is low-contrast and hard to read
Category: Accessibility (WCAG)
Why it matters: Text that does not stand out enough from its background is hard to read for many visitors, and fails accessibility guidelines Google checks.

### 4. [HIGH] Some buttons have no accessible name
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Tracking
Why it matters: A button with only an icon and no label is announced as "button" by screen readers, giving no idea what it does.

### 5. [MEDIUM] Google is writing your search snippet for you
Category: SEO
Why it matters: This page has no meta description, so Google grabs whatever text it finds on the page and shows that under your title in search results. Usually it's not the pitch you'd write yourself. Adding a 120 to 160 character summary is one of the easier wins for search click-through.

### 6. [MEDIUM] No XML sitemap found
Why it matters: No sitemap.xml at the standard location and none listed in robots.txt. A sitemap tells search engines every page you want indexed; without it they rely on link discovery and may miss pages.

### 7. [LOW] Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)
Category: Performance, SEO
Why it matters: 5 of 5 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift.
Exact elements found: hazy-logo.png "Hazy", ZMCC2OV4TJMZT25WH7JUZ6WJMI.avif "homer profile picture", ae18392378f93d9e6ec011cb64d8e326.jpg "Adrian profile picture", 71de20d641ef16630c4af2a0597077d7.png "Intentos profile picture", hazy-logo.png "Hazy"

### 8. [LOW] Unused CSS is being downloaded
Category: Performance
Why it matters: Style rules that this page never uses still block rendering while they download. Trimming them frees the paint path. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 18 KiB.

### 9. [LOW] No email capture or newsletter detected
Category: Conversion
Why it matters: No email input field was found in the page, and no email-marketing tag (Klaviyo, Mailchimp, Substack, ConvertKit, Beehiiv, MailerLite, ActiveCampaign, Omnisend, Brevo, Drip or Buttondown) was detected. A form that loads after JavaScript runs, or one behind a popup or a separate page, will not be visible to this check. If capturing visitors is relevant to this site, an email signup builds an owned audience you keep regardless of ad costs. Not every site needs one.

### 10. [LOW] No visible contact details (email or phone)
Category: Conversion
Why it matters: This page exposes no email address, no phone link, no contact form and no link to a contact page. For higher-value or trust-sensitive purchases, a clear way to reach a human reduces hesitation. A contact route that only appears after JavaScript runs, or that lives on a page not checked here, will not be visible to this check. Add an email or phone link in the header or footer.

### 11. [LOW] Search-result title is leaving room on the table
Category: SEO
Why it matters: Google gives you about 60 characters of headline space in search results. This page is using 4. Adding the value proposition or a relevant keyword gives someone one more reason to click.

### 12. [LOW] No advertising pixel detected
Category: Tracking
Why it matters: Analytics is present but no Meta/Google/TikTok ad pixel was found. If you run paid ads, conversion tracking should be installed before the next campaign so the platforms can optimize toward buyers, not clicks.

### 13. [LOW] No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's ranking
Why it matters: When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs (think tracking parameters or session IDs), Google can split your ranking signal across them. A single canonical tag tells Google which version counts.

### 14. [LOW] No structured data for rich search results
Why it matters: The page has no schema.org markup. Adding the right type (Product, Article, Organization, FAQ) lets Google show rich results like star ratings and prices, which lift click-through for free.

### 15. [LOW] No llms.txt file
Category: SEO
Why it matters: No /llms.txt. Optional: some AI tools read this file (Anthropic, Vercel, Stripe, Cloudflare and Hugging Face publish one, and AI coding assistants use it to find docs), so adding one is a cheap courtesy to them. Google has said in writing that Google Search and its AI features do not use llms.txt, so do not expect a search-ranking or AI Overviews benefit from it.

## How to respond
Work through the issues in order. For each one give me the specific change that fixes it: real code or real copy, not advice. Keep changes minimal and match the existing style of the site.
Where several issues share one root cause, say so and fix it once rather than patching each symptom.
If an issue cannot be fixed without seeing more of the code, say exactly which file or selector you need instead of guessing.
15 findings, ready to paste

02Performance: phone, desktop, and real visitors

MetricMobileDesktopRead
TTFB (lab median)99 ms98 msLab
FCP (lab median)294 ms378 msLab
LCP (lab median)342 ms378 msGood
Page weight (median)1.8 MB2.2 MBOK

Google Lighthouse (lab): Performance 63 mobile / 90 desktop, SEO 92, Accessibility 87, Best Practices 100.

Lab numbers are from a headless mobile browser on an unthrottled connection: treat them as a floor, not a typical experience. Add a Google API key to light up real-user field data (CrUX) and Lighthouse scores.

03Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile

10 of 20 tappable items on this page come in below the platform minimums for reliable tapping on a phone (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp; WCAG 2.5.8 sets 24px as the hard accessibility floor). The same ones came up small on every one of the 4 test loads, so this is the page itself, not a fluke.

When customers can't tap what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave. They don't file a bug. They don't try again. They just leave. A desktop dashboard can't see this because it's the difference between a thumb and a cursor.

The buttons measuring below the minimum on this scan:

  • a 20x34 "homer GitHub"
  • a 20x34 "Adrian GitHub"
  • a 20x34 "Jean GitHub"
  • a 98x24 "Commands"
  • a 68x24 "Pricing"
  • a 124x24 "Documentation"
  • a 63x24 "Terms"
  • a 71x24 "Privacy"

The fix is CSS-only on most sites: add padding around the icon (don't just change the icon size) so the actual tap area is at least 44×44 pixels. No redesign, no new assets.

04Technical SEO & structured data

CheckResult
TitleHazy (4 chars)
Meta descriptionMissing
H11 on page
CanonicalMissing
Structured data (JSON-LD)None
Open GraphTitle + image

05The fix checklist

Everything to fix, priority first, each tagged with the screen it affects and a rough effort. Work top to bottom.

  1. Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobileMobileCSS only
  2. Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothCSS only
  3. Unused CSS is being downloadedBothVaries
  4. No email capture or newsletter detectedBothVaries
  5. No visible contact details (email or phone)BothVaries
  6. Add quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothVaries
  7. Google is writing your search snippet for youBoth1 line
  8. Search-result title is leaving room on the tableBoth1 line
  9. No advertising pixel detectedBothDev afternoon
  10. No XML sitemap foundBothVaries
  11. No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's rankingBoth1 line
  12. No structured data for rich search resultsBothVaries
  13. No llms.txt fileBothVaries
  14. Some text is low-contrast and hard to readBothVaries
  15. Some buttons have no accessible nameBothVaries

Effort is a rough read from the outside: "CSS only" means no new assets or backend work, "1 line" means a single tag, "Dev afternoon" means a developer needs to touch tracking or scripts.

06What this report cannot tell you

Everything above is from the outside, looking at the page on a simulated phone and desktop. The questions that actually decide revenue need real visitors. Install the Harvv pixel (one script tag, 16 KB, zero personal data, no engineering project) and within about 72 hours you'd know which buttons real customers tapped and missed, how often Google Analytics is missing visits, and exactly where mobile shoppers stalled and left. This report shows you where to look. The pixel shows you how often it happens, and to whom.

What to do next
See this same depth on your real visitors, every day.

Drop the Harvv pixel on hazybot.net and we turn this one-off scan into ongoing measured behavior: which taps miss, where sessions stall, and the real drop rates. Free to start, no card needed.

Add the pixel free

07How we did this, and what it can't prove

  • 4 mobile + 2 desktop loads of one URL from headless Chrome (iPhone viewport at 390px, desktop at 1366px), August 28, 2026. Enough loads to separate real defects from random noise, not a full-site crawl.
  • Lab numbers, not real-user numbers (no field data was available for this run). Real devices on real networks run slower.
  • Friction is inferred, not counted. We can prove a button is small. We can't, from the outside, count how often it causes a missed tap. That requires the pixel on a live page.

About Harvv, the source of this teardown

Harvv is a behavioral UX analytics platform (harvv.com). A lightweight JavaScript pixel captures how real visitors behave on a site (dead clicks, rage clicks, scroll depth, Core Web Vitals, JavaScript errors, and 50+ other signals) and the engine turns them into prioritized, plain-English findings. This teardown is the outside-in version of that: the same detectors run against a public page, with no pixel installed.

How to read it. Every finding here is a reproducible, automated measurement, not an opinion: element sizes, contrast ratios, load metrics, and structured-data checks that anyone can re-run against the same URL. The method is stated in full above. Automated testing catches a subset of issues, so this is a starting point, not a certification.

Full disclosure. Harvv makes the pixel that would measure the friction these findings imply, so we have a commercial interest. That is exactly why the findings are kept to things a reader can verify independently, and why nothing here is inflated: an unreproducible claim would undermine the tool it is meant to demonstrate.

Prepared by Harvv (harvv.com), a behavioral UX analytics platform. Last updated August 28, 2026.

Related teardowns

Eco Host
Behavioral teardown
Vibhinngautam
Behavioral teardown
Forgeyourpathai
Behavioral teardown
Ysdev Ca
Behavioral teardown

See all site teardowns →

harvv://this-page live
Scroll depth how far you read0%
Dead clicks clicks that did nothing0
Rage clicks frustration bursts0
Interactions clicks that worked0
event log · live