Site teardown · Mihirnaik
mihirnaik.com
Site health · August 19, 2026
Prepared by Harvv

What your site is actually doing.

One page: what is working, what is costing you visitors, and what to fix next. A phone-and-desktop teardown of the live site: 6 phone loads + 3 desktop loads. No login, no insider access, no Harvv pixel needed. The full evidence is at the bottom.

August 19, 2026·External scan·6 mobile + 3 desktop loads · no pixel data·Download as PDF

Working

What's already working. These held up across every load.

1.0s

Speed is good.

0.0MB

The page is about 0.0 MB across 96 requests. That keeps it quick on mobile data and cheap to load repeatedly.

100/100

Lighthouse scores SEO 100/100. The fundamentals Google looks for are present.

Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

Costing you

Ranked by what hurts conversion most. Full evidence below.

cvr

JavaScript errors were logged during load

41%

Add quotations so AI engines cite this page

faint

Some text is low-contrast and hard to read

5

5 potential dead-click targets

fix

Security headers are missing or weak

5

5 interactive elements have no stable, accessible identity

Fixing next
dead clicks and image sizes.

2 small changes, on the pages people actually land on: 5 potential dead-click targets; Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now). We re-measure the same samples after.

2
hours
AI search visibility
How visible is mihirnaik.com to AI search?
ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews are the new front page. The AI checks in this report are a preview. A free account turns them into a live 0 to 100 score, tracked daily and benchmarked against your competitors.
See the full AI report, free

01Findings, ranked by what hurts conversion most

SeverityFindingHow we know
HighJavaScript errors were logged during loadBothConversionTracking
Errors in the console often mean a feature silently broke: a button that does nothing, analytics that did not fire, a form that will not submit.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowImages have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothPerformanceSEO
46 of 72 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowUnused JavaScript is being downloadedBothPerformance
Code that never runs on this page still costs download and parse time on every visit. Splitting or removing it speeds up load. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 85 KiB.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowUnused CSS is being downloadedBothPerformance
Style rules that this page never uses still block rendering while they download. Trimming them frees the paint path. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 31 KiB.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
HighAdd quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothAI SearchSEO
Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 8 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowSearch-result title will be cut offBothSEO
The title is 74 characters; Google truncates around 60. Front-load the important words so nothing useful gets clipped.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo third-party analytics tag detectedBothTracking
No Google Analytics, GA4, or other third-party analytics tag was found in the page. If you rely only on platform or server-side analytics that is fine; but if not, a third-party tag is the baseline way to see how many visitors arrive, where they come from, and what converts. First-party or server-side analytics are not detectable from the outside, so this may already be handled.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
Medium5 potential dead-click targetsBothConversionAccessibility (WCAG)Tracking
Elements styled like buttons but with no anchor, no <button> wrapper, no role="button", and no click attribute. Real visitors tap these expecting something to happen, then leave. Examples on this page: "Resources" (span.header-nav-link), "Services" (span.header-nav-link), "Projects" (span.header-nav-link).
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's rankingBoth
When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs (think tracking parameters or session IDs), Google can split your ranking signal across them. A single canonical tag tells Google which version counts.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo llms.txt fileBothSEO
No /llms.txt. Optional: some AI tools read this file (Anthropic, Vercel, Stripe, Cloudflare and Hugging Face publish one, and AI coding assistants use it to find docs), so adding one is a cheap courtesy to them. Google has said in writing that Google Search and its AI features do not use llms.txt, so do not expect a search-ranking or AI Overviews benefit from it.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
HighSome text is low-contrast and hard to readBothAccessibility (WCAG)
Text that does not stand out enough from its background is hard to read for many visitors, and fails accessibility guidelines Google checks.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumSecurity headers are missing or weakBothSecurity
The server response is missing browser-hardening headers that protect visitors and are a standard security and agency checklist item. Missing or weak here: Content-Security-Policy (the main defense against injected and cross-site scripts); clickjacking protection (X-Frame-Options or a CSP frame-ancestors rule); HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security, which forces HTTPS on return visits); X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff (stops MIME-type sniffing attacks). These are set at the server, CDN, or host level (most platforms expose them in settings or a config file) and do not change how the site looks or performs.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
Medium5 interactive elements have no stable, accessible identityBothAccessibility (WCAG)Tracking
These elements are clicked like buttons but expose no accessible name, or are a plain div/span used as a control with no role. Assistive tech announces only a role (or nothing), and analytics and heatmaps have no human-readable label or stable selector to bind the click to, so the click is both inaccessible and untrackable, and any redesign silently breaks click aggregation. Give each one a real <button>/<a>, an aria-label, and a stable id or data-attribute.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowHeadings skip levelsBothAccessibility (WCAG)
Jumping from an H1 straight to an H4 breaks the document outline that screen readers and search engines rely on.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT

Accessibility findings are automated checks against Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 and 2.2. They flag potential barriers and legal risk, not a certification or a determination of compliance with the ADA, Section 508, or EN 301 549. Automated testing catches only a subset of issues; a full conformance review needs manual and assistive-technology testing by a qualified reviewer.

From finding to fix
Want the fix, not just the finding?
Install Harvv and we turn each issue above into a ready-to-paste prompt for your AI coding assistant. Drop it into Cursor, Claude, or Copilot and the diagnosis becomes a concrete code change, written against this exact page.
Get the fix prompts

"How we know": unlabeled = a deterministic fact, identical on every load (e.g. element sizes). Most findings are this kind, so we only mark the exceptions: median across loads = a noisy lab metric, reported as a median. real-user field data = Google CrUX, actual Chrome visitors.

Structural and AI-search checks crawl up to 8 pages from your sitemap (a sample, not your full site). "Broken" means a link returned 404, 410, or 5xx, or did not respond; access-controlled pages (401, 403) are not counted.

01bTake the whole report to your AI

Every finding above in one payload, with the reasoning behind each one. The prompt is written to be pasted into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT. The JSON is for piping into your own tooling.

Includes the site context, what is already working (so your assistant does not "fix" it), and every finding with its severity, evidence, and why it matters.
Audit of https://mihirnaik.com/, run August 19, 2026. 14 issues were found. I want them fixed.

## Context
- Site: https://mihirnaik.com/
- Mobile LCP (lab median): 984 ms
- Desktop LCP (lab median): 1024 ms
- Page weight (median): 0.0 MB
- Tap targets under 44px: 18% (12 of 65)
- Evidence base: 6 mobile + 3 desktop loads

## Already working, do not change these
- Speed is good: The main content paints in about 1.0s in our test loads, inside Google's 2.5s "good" threshold. Real networks are slower, but the page itself is not heavy.
- Light page weight: The page is about 0.0 MB across 96 requests. That keeps it quick on mobile data and cheap to load repeatedly.
- Search basics are in place: Lighthouse scores SEO 100/100. The fundamentals Google looks for are present.
- Layout holds on phone and desktop: Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

## Issues, most damaging first

### 1. [HIGH] JavaScript errors were logged during load
Category: Conversion, Tracking
Why it matters: Errors in the console often mean a feature silently broke: a button that does nothing, analytics that did not fire, a form that will not submit.

### 2. [HIGH] Add quotations so AI engines cite this page
Category: AI Search, SEO
Why it matters: Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 8 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)

### 3. [HIGH] Some text is low-contrast and hard to read
Category: Accessibility (WCAG)
Why it matters: Text that does not stand out enough from its background is hard to read for many visitors, and fails accessibility guidelines Google checks.

### 4. [MEDIUM] 5 potential dead-click targets
Category: Conversion, Accessibility (WCAG), Tracking
Why it matters: Elements styled like buttons but with no anchor, no <button> wrapper, no role="button", and no click attribute. Real visitors tap these expecting something to happen, then leave. Examples on this page: "Resources" (span.header-nav-link), "Services" (span.header-nav-link), "Projects" (span.header-nav-link).
Exact elements found: "Resources" (span.header-nav-link), "Services" (span.header-nav-link), "Projects" (span.header-nav-link), "Perplexity" (div.hero-rotator-pill), "Share your challenge and we'll see if we're a fi" (div.ant-typography)

### 5. [MEDIUM] Security headers are missing or weak
Category: Security
Why it matters: The server response is missing browser-hardening headers that protect visitors and are a standard security and agency checklist item. Missing or weak here: Content-Security-Policy (the main defense against injected and cross-site scripts); clickjacking protection (X-Frame-Options or a CSP frame-ancestors rule); HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security, which forces HTTPS on return visits); X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff (stops MIME-type sniffing attacks). These are set at the server, CDN, or host level (most platforms expose them in settings or a config file) and do not change how the site looks or performs.

### 6. [MEDIUM] 5 interactive elements have no stable, accessible identity
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Tracking
Why it matters: These elements are clicked like buttons but expose no accessible name, or are a plain div/span used as a control with no role. Assistive tech announces only a role (or nothing), and analytics and heatmaps have no human-readable label or stable selector to bind the click to, so the click is both inaccessible and untrackable, and any redesign silently breaks click aggregation. Give each one a real <button>/<a>, an aria-label, and a stable id or data-attribute.
Exact elements found: "Resources" (span.header-nav-link) (div/span used as a button, no role), "Services" (span.header-nav-link) (div/span used as a button, no role), "Projects" (span.header-nav-link) (div/span used as a button, no role), "Perplexity" (div.hero-rotator-pill) (div/span used as a button, no role), "Share your challenge and we'll see if we" (div.ant-typography) (div/span used as a button, no role)

### 7. [LOW] Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)
Category: Performance, SEO
Why it matters: 46 of 72 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift.
Exact elements found: perplexity.svg, airnewzealand.svg "Air New Zealand", att.svg "AT&T", bbc.svg "BBC", capgemini.svg "Capgemini", clickup.svg "ClickUp"

### 8. [LOW] Unused JavaScript is being downloaded
Category: Performance
Why it matters: Code that never runs on this page still costs download and parse time on every visit. Splitting or removing it speeds up load. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 85 KiB.

### 9. [LOW] Unused CSS is being downloaded
Category: Performance
Why it matters: Style rules that this page never uses still block rendering while they download. Trimming them frees the paint path. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 31 KiB.

### 10. [LOW] Search-result title will be cut off
Category: SEO
Why it matters: The title is 74 characters; Google truncates around 60. Front-load the important words so nothing useful gets clipped.

### 11. [LOW] No third-party analytics tag detected
Category: Tracking
Why it matters: No Google Analytics, GA4, or other third-party analytics tag was found in the page. If you rely only on platform or server-side analytics that is fine; but if not, a third-party tag is the baseline way to see how many visitors arrive, where they come from, and what converts. First-party or server-side analytics are not detectable from the outside, so this may already be handled.

### 12. [LOW] No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's ranking
Why it matters: When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs (think tracking parameters or session IDs), Google can split your ranking signal across them. A single canonical tag tells Google which version counts.

### 13. [LOW] No llms.txt file
Category: SEO
Why it matters: No /llms.txt. Optional: some AI tools read this file (Anthropic, Vercel, Stripe, Cloudflare and Hugging Face publish one, and AI coding assistants use it to find docs), so adding one is a cheap courtesy to them. Google has said in writing that Google Search and its AI features do not use llms.txt, so do not expect a search-ranking or AI Overviews benefit from it.

### 14. [LOW] Headings skip levels
Category: Accessibility (WCAG)
Why it matters: Jumping from an H1 straight to an H4 breaks the document outline that screen readers and search engines rely on.

## How to respond
Work through the issues in order. For each one give me the specific change that fixes it: real code or real copy, not advice. Keep changes minimal and match the existing style of the site.
Where several issues share one root cause, say so and fix it once rather than patching each symptom.
If an issue cannot be fixed without seeing more of the code, say exactly which file or selector you need instead of guessing.
14 findings, ready to paste

02Performance: phone, desktop, and real visitors

MetricMobileDesktopRead
TTFB (lab median)589 ms597 msLab
FCP (lab median)984 ms1.0sLab
LCP (lab median)984 ms1.0sGood
Page weight (median)0.0 MB0.1 MBOK

Google Lighthouse (lab): Performance 63 mobile / 60 desktop, SEO 100, Accessibility 95, Best Practices 96.

Lab numbers are from a headless mobile browser on an unthrottled connection: treat them as a floor, not a typical experience. Add a Google API key to light up real-user field data (CrUX) and Lighthouse scores.

03Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile

12 of 65 tappable items on this page come in below 44×44 pixels, the size Apple and Google both recommend for reliable tapping on a phone. The same ones came up small on every one of the 6 test loads, so this is the page itself, not a fluke.

When customers can't tap what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave. They don't file a bug. They don't try again. They just leave. A desktop dashboard can't see this because it's the difference between a thumb and a cursor.

The buttons measuring below the minimum on this scan:

  • a 115x20 "Read full bio →"
  • a 94x20 "Clarity ArcAI"
  • a 191x20 "consulting engagements"
  • a 110x22 "LinkedIn 18k+"
  • a 69x22 "X 2.8k+"
  • a 120x22 "Newsletter 2k+"
  • a 103x22 "YouTube ~1k"
  • a 63x22 "GitHub"

The fix is CSS-only on most sites: add padding around the icon (don't just change the icon size) so the actual tap area is at least 44×44 pixels. No redesign, no new assets.

04Technical SEO & structured data

CheckResult
TitleMihir Naik | AI Search (AEO) Professional, Product Leader & Enterprise SEO (74 chars)
Meta description246 chars
H11 on page
CanonicalMissing
Structured data (JSON-LD)2 block(s)
Open GraphTitle + image

05The fix checklist

Everything to fix, priority first, each tagged with the screen it affects and a rough effort. Work top to bottom.

  1. JavaScript errors were logged during loadBothDev afternoon
  2. Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothCSS only
  3. Unused JavaScript is being downloadedBothVaries
  4. Unused CSS is being downloadedBothVaries
  5. Add quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothVaries
  6. Search-result title will be cut offBoth1 line
  7. No third-party analytics tag detectedBothDev afternoon
  8. 5 potential dead-click targetsBothCSS only
  9. No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's rankingBoth1 line
  10. No llms.txt fileBothVaries
  11. Some text is low-contrast and hard to readBothVaries
  12. Security headers are missing or weakBothVaries
  13. 5 interactive elements have no stable, accessible identityBothDev afternoon
  14. Headings skip levelsBothVaries

Effort is a rough read from the outside: "CSS only" means no new assets or backend work, "1 line" means a single tag, "Dev afternoon" means a developer needs to touch tracking or scripts.

06What this report cannot tell you

Everything above is from the outside, looking at the page on a simulated phone and desktop. The questions that actually decide revenue need real visitors. Install the Harvv pixel (one script tag, 16 KB, zero personal data, no engineering project) and within about 72 hours you'd know which buttons real customers tapped and missed, how often Google Analytics is missing visits, and exactly where mobile shoppers stalled and left. This report shows you where to look. The pixel shows you how often it happens, and to whom.

What to do next
See this same depth on your real visitors, every day.

Drop the Harvv pixel on mihirnaik.com and we turn this one-off scan into ongoing measured behavior: which taps miss, where sessions stall, and the real drop rates. Free to start, no card needed.

Add the pixel free

07How we did this, and what it can't prove

  • 6 mobile + 3 desktop loads of one URL from headless Chrome (iPhone viewport at 390px, desktop at 1366px), August 19, 2026. Enough loads to separate real defects from random noise, not a full-site crawl.
  • Lab numbers, not real-user numbers (no field data was available for this run). Real devices on real networks run slower.
  • Friction is inferred, not counted. We can prove a button is small. We can't, from the outside, count how often it causes a missed tap. That requires the pixel on a live page.

About Harvv, the source of this teardown

Harvv is a behavioral UX analytics platform (harvv.com). A lightweight JavaScript pixel captures how real visitors behave on a site (dead clicks, rage clicks, scroll depth, Core Web Vitals, JavaScript errors, and 50+ other signals) and the engine turns them into prioritized, plain-English findings. This teardown is the outside-in version of that: the same detectors run against a public page, with no pixel installed.

How to read it. Every finding here is a reproducible, automated measurement, not an opinion: element sizes, contrast ratios, load metrics, and structured-data checks that anyone can re-run against the same URL. The method is stated in full above. Automated testing catches a subset of issues, so this is a starting point, not a certification.

Full disclosure. Harvv makes the pixel that would measure the friction these findings imply, so we have a commercial interest. That is exactly why the findings are kept to things a reader can verify independently, and why nothing here is inflated: an unreproducible claim would undermine the tool it is meant to demonstrate.

Prepared by Harvv (harvv.com), a behavioral UX analytics platform. Last updated August 19, 2026.

Related teardowns

Hemerascope
Behavioral teardown
Harvv
Behavioral teardown
Nowkickback
Behavioral teardown
Mwjsautomations
Behavioral teardown

See all site teardowns →

harvv://this-page live
Scroll depth how far you read0%
Dead clicks clicks that did nothing0
Rage clicks frustration bursts0
Interactions clicks that worked0
event log · live