What your site is actually doing.
One page: what is working, what is costing you visitors, and what to fix next. A phone-and-desktop teardown of the live site: 4 phone loads + 2 desktop loads. No login, no insider access, no Harvv pixel needed. The full evidence is at the bottom.
Working
What's already working. These held up across every load.
Speed is good.
Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.
Costing you
Ranked by what hurts conversion most. Full evidence below.
Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile
3 form fields have no label
Add quotations so AI engines cite this page
Some text is low-contrast and hard to read
JavaScript crashed while the page was loading
Google is writing your search snippet for you
3 small changes, on the pages people actually land on: Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile; Google is writing your search snippet for you; Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now). We re-measure the same samples after.
01Findings, ranked by what hurts conversion most
| Severity | Finding | How we know |
|---|---|---|
| High | Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobileMobileAccessibility (WCAG)Conversion 4 of 6 tappable items on this page (67%) measure under 24 pixels on their shorter side, below the 24px floor WCAG 2.5.8 sets for accessibility and well under the platform minimums (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp) for reliable tapping, and the same ones came up small on every test load. When visitors can't hit what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave instead of trying again. The exact elements we found: paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | |
| Medium | JavaScript crashed while the page was loadingBothConversionTracking 1 script error fired during page load. When a script crashes, buttons sometimes stop working, analytics stop firing, and the visitor has no warning. Worth opening the browser console to find which script failed. The exact errors we found: paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | median across loads |
| Low | Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothPerformanceSEO 29 of 29 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift. The exact images we found (6 of 29): paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | |
| Low | The page is heavy to downloadBothPerformance Total page weight is high. On a phone with patchy data, that is extra seconds of blank screen before the page is usable. Lighthouse measured: Total size was 11,626 KiB. paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | |
| High | 3 form fields have no labelBothAccessibility (WCAG)ConversionTracking Screen readers can't announce these fields, and a sighted user who clears the placeholder can't recover the prompt. Wrap each input in <label>…</label> or add aria-label. The exact elements we found: paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | |
| Low | No visible contact details (email or phone)BothConversion This page exposes no email address, no phone link, no contact form and no link to a contact page. For higher-value or trust-sensitive purchases, a clear way to reach a human reduces hesitation. A contact route that only appears after JavaScript runs, or that lives on a page not checked here, will not be visible to this check. Add an email or phone link in the header or footer. paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | |
| High | Add quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothAI SearchSEO Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 1 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.) paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | |
| Medium | Google is writing your search snippet for youBothSEO This page has no meta description, so Google grabs whatever text it finds on the page and shows that under your title in search results. Usually it's not the pitch you'd write yourself. Adding a 120 to 160 character summary is one of the easier wins for search click-through. paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | |
| Low | Search-result title is leaving room on the tableBothSEO Google gives you about 60 characters of headline space in search results. This page is using 15. Adding the value proposition or a relevant keyword gives someone one more reason to click. paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | |
| Low | No third-party analytics tag detectedBothTracking No Google Analytics, GA4, or other third-party analytics tag was found in the page. If you rely only on platform or server-side analytics that is fine; but if not, a third-party tag is the baseline way to see how many visitors arrive, where they come from, and what converts. First-party or server-side analytics are not detectable from the outside, so this may already be handled. paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | |
| Low | No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's rankingBoth When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs (think tracking parameters or session IDs), Google can split your ranking signal across them. A single canonical tag tells Google which version counts. paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | |
| Low | Links to this page will look bare when sharedBoth The page is missing its Open Graph title and image, so when someone shares it on Facebook, LinkedIn, iMessage, or Slack the preview has no title and image. A flat grey link gets far fewer clicks than one with an image and headline. paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | |
| Low | No structured data for rich search resultsBoth The page has no schema.org markup. Adding the right type (Product, Article, Organization, FAQ) lets Google show rich results like star ratings and prices, which lift click-through for free. paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | |
| Low | 2 form fields missing autocomplete hintBothConversionAccessibility (WCAG) Browsers can autofill name, email, phone, address from the user's saved profile only when you tell them which field is which via autocomplete="email", autocomplete="name", etc. Faster checkout, fewer typos. The exact elements we found: paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | |
| Low | No llms.txt fileBothSEO No /llms.txt. Optional: some AI tools read this file (Anthropic, Vercel, Stripe, Cloudflare and Hugging Face publish one, and AI coding assistants use it to find docs), so adding one is a cheap courtesy to them. Google has said in writing that Google Search and its AI features do not use llms.txt, so do not expect a search-ranking or AI Overviews benefit from it. paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | |
| High | Some text is low-contrast and hard to readBothAccessibility (WCAG) Text that does not stand out enough from its background is hard to read for many visitors, and fails accessibility guidelines Google checks. The exact elements we found: paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | |
| Low | 2 generic CTA links/buttons ("Click here", "Learn more", "Submit")BothAccessibility (WCAG)Conversion Screen-reader users hear a list of "click here, click here, learn more" with no context. Sighted users learn nothing about where the link goes from the label alone. Rewrite each CTA to describe the destination ("See pricing", "Read the case study"). The exact elements we found: paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT | |
| Low | Headings skip levelsBothAccessibility (WCAG) Skipping a heading level breaks the document outline that screen readers and search engines rely on. On this page the outline jumps to an H3 without the level above it, at "Keeping you connected". Lighthouse flagged 1 heading out of order. paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT |
Accessibility findings are automated checks against Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 and 2.2. They flag potential barriers and legal risk, not a certification or a determination of compliance with the ADA, Section 508, or EN 301 549. Automated testing catches only a subset of issues; a full conformance review needs manual and assistive-technology testing by a qualified reviewer.
"How we know": unlabeled = a deterministic fact, identical on every load (e.g. element sizes). Most findings are this kind, so we only mark the exceptions: median across loads = a noisy lab metric, reported as a median. real-user field data = Google CrUX, actual Chrome visitors.
Structural and AI-search checks crawl up to 8 pages from your sitemap (a sample, not your full site). "Broken" means a link returned 404, 410, or 5xx, or did not respond; access-controlled pages (401, 403) are not counted.
02Performance: phone, desktop, and real visitors
| Metric | Mobile | Desktop | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB (lab median) | 102 ms | 60 ms | Lab |
| FCP (lab median) | 286 ms | 256 ms | Lab |
| LCP (lab median) | 412 ms | 1.1s | Good |
| Page weight (median) | not measured | not measured | OK |
Google Lighthouse (lab): Performance 34 (mobile), SEO 83, Accessibility 88, Best Practices 100.
Lab numbers are from a headless mobile browser on an unthrottled connection: treat them as a floor, not a typical experience. Add a Google API key to light up real-user field data (CrUX) and Lighthouse scores.
03Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile
4 of 6 tappable items on this page come in below the platform minimums for reliable tapping on a phone (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp; WCAG 2.5.8 sets 24px as the hard accessibility floor). The same ones came up small on every one of the 4 test loads, so this is the page itself, not a fluke.
The buttons measuring below the minimum on this scan:
- a 25x18 "here"
- a 48x20 "Instagram"
- a 48x20 "LinkedIn"
- a 98x15 "missiondigital.co.uk"
The fix is CSS-only on most sites: add padding around the icon (don't just change the icon size) so the actual tap area is at least 44×44 pixels. No redesign, no new assets.
04Technical SEO & structured data
| Check | Result |
|---|---|
| Title | Mission Gateway (15 chars) |
| Meta description | Missing |
| H1 | 1 on page |
| Canonical | Missing |
| Structured data (JSON-LD) | None |
| Open Graph | Incomplete |
05The fix checklist
Everything to fix, priority first, each tagged with the screen it affects and a rough effort. Work top to bottom.
- Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobileMobileCSS only
- JavaScript crashed while the page was loadingBothDev afternoon
- Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothCSS only
- The page is heavy to downloadBothSmall
- 3 form fields have no labelBothVaries
- No visible contact details (email or phone)BothVaries
- Add quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothVaries
- Google is writing your search snippet for youBoth1 line
- Search-result title is leaving room on the tableBoth1 line
- No third-party analytics tag detectedBothDev afternoon
- No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's rankingBoth1 line
- Links to this page will look bare when sharedBoth1 line
- No structured data for rich search resultsBothVaries
- 2 form fields missing autocomplete hintBothVaries
- No llms.txt fileBothVaries
- Some text is low-contrast and hard to readBothVaries
- 2 generic CTA links/buttons ("Click here", "Learn more", "Submit")BothVaries
- Headings skip levelsBothVaries
Effort is a rough read from the outside: "CSS only" means no new assets or backend work, "1 line" means a single tag, "Dev afternoon" means a developer needs to touch tracking or scripts.
06What this report cannot tell you
Everything above is from the outside, looking at the page on a simulated phone and desktop. The questions that actually decide revenue need real visitors. Install the Harvv pixel (one script tag, 16 KB, zero personal data, no engineering project) and within about 72 hours you'd know which buttons real customers tapped and missed, how often Google Analytics is missing visits, and exactly where mobile shoppers stalled and left. This report shows you where to look. The pixel shows you how often it happens, and to whom.
Drop the Harvv pixel on mission-gateway.missiondigital.co.uk and we turn this one-off scan into ongoing measured behavior: which taps miss, where sessions stall, and the real drop rates. Free to start, no card needed.
Add the pixel free07How we did this, and what it can't prove
- 4 mobile + 2 desktop loads of one URL from headless Chrome (iPhone viewport at 390px, desktop at 1366px), September 8, 2026. Enough loads to separate real defects from random noise, not a full-site crawl.
- Lab numbers, not real-user numbers (no field data was available for this run). Real devices on real networks run slower.
- Friction is inferred, not counted. We can prove a button is small. We can't, from the outside, count how often it causes a missed tap. That requires the pixel on a live page.
About Harvv, the source of this teardown
Harvv is a behavioral UX analytics platform (harvv.com). A lightweight JavaScript pixel captures how real visitors behave on a site (dead clicks, rage clicks, scroll depth, Core Web Vitals, JavaScript errors, and 50+ other signals) and the engine turns them into prioritized, plain-English findings. This teardown is the outside-in version of that: the same detectors run against a public page, with no pixel installed.
How to read it. Every finding here is a reproducible, automated measurement, not an opinion: element sizes, contrast ratios, load metrics, and structured-data checks that anyone can re-run against the same URL. The method is stated in full above. Automated testing catches a subset of issues, so this is a starting point, not a certification.
Full disclosure. Harvv makes the pixel that would measure the friction these findings imply, so we have a commercial interest. That is exactly why the findings are kept to things a reader can verify independently, and why nothing here is inflated: an unreproducible claim would undermine the tool it is meant to demonstrate.
Prepared by Harvv (harvv.com), a behavioral UX analytics platform. Last updated September 8, 2026.