Site teardown · Mission Gateway Missiondigital Co
mission-gateway.missiondigital.co.uk
Site health · September 8, 2026
Prepared by Harvv

What your site is actually doing.

One page: what is working, what is costing you visitors, and what to fix next. A phone-and-desktop teardown of the live site: 4 phone loads + 2 desktop loads. No login, no insider access, no Harvv pixel needed. The full evidence is at the bottom.

September 8, 2026·External scan·4 mobile + 2 desktop loads · no pixel data·Download as PDF

Working

What's already working. These held up across every load.

0.4s

Speed is good.

✓

Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

Costing you

Ranked by what hurts conversion most. Full evidence below.

4/6

Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile

3

3 form fields have no label

41%

Add quotations so AI engines cite this page

faint

Some text is low-contrast and hard to read

1

JavaScript crashed while the page was loading

120

Google is writing your search snippet for you

Fixing next
tap targets, meta description and image sizes.

3 small changes, on the pages people actually land on: Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile; Google is writing your search snippet for you; Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now). We re-measure the same samples after.

3
hours
AI search visibility
How visible is mission-gateway.missiondigital.co.uk to AI search?
ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews are the new front page. The AI checks in this report are a preview. A free account turns them into a live 0 to 100 score, tracked daily and benchmarked against your competitors.
See the full AI report, free

01Findings, ranked by what hurts conversion most

SeverityFindingHow we know
HighTiny buttons are hard to tap on mobileMobileAccessibility (WCAG)Conversion
4 of 6 tappable items on this page (67%) measure under 24 pixels on their shorter side, below the 24px floor WCAG 2.5.8 sets for accessibility and well under the platform minimums (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp) for reliable tapping, and the same ones came up small on every test load. When visitors can't hit what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave instead of trying again.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumJavaScript crashed while the page was loadingBothConversionTracking
1 script error fired during page load. When a script crashes, buttons sometimes stop working, analytics stop firing, and the visitor has no warning. Worth opening the browser console to find which script failed.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
median across loads
LowImages have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothPerformanceSEO
29 of 29 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowThe page is heavy to downloadBothPerformance
Total page weight is high. On a phone with patchy data, that is extra seconds of blank screen before the page is usable. Lighthouse measured: Total size was 11,626 KiB.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
High3 form fields have no labelBothAccessibility (WCAG)ConversionTracking
Screen readers can't announce these fields, and a sighted user who clears the placeholder can't recover the prompt. Wrap each input in <label>…</label> or add aria-label.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo visible contact details (email or phone)BothConversion
This page exposes no email address, no phone link, no contact form and no link to a contact page. For higher-value or trust-sensitive purchases, a clear way to reach a human reduces hesitation. A contact route that only appears after JavaScript runs, or that lives on a page not checked here, will not be visible to this check. Add an email or phone link in the header or footer.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
HighAdd quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothAI SearchSEO
Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 1 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumGoogle is writing your search snippet for youBothSEO
This page has no meta description, so Google grabs whatever text it finds on the page and shows that under your title in search results. Usually it's not the pitch you'd write yourself. Adding a 120 to 160 character summary is one of the easier wins for search click-through.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowSearch-result title is leaving room on the tableBothSEO
Google gives you about 60 characters of headline space in search results. This page is using 15. Adding the value proposition or a relevant keyword gives someone one more reason to click.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo third-party analytics tag detectedBothTracking
No Google Analytics, GA4, or other third-party analytics tag was found in the page. If you rely only on platform or server-side analytics that is fine; but if not, a third-party tag is the baseline way to see how many visitors arrive, where they come from, and what converts. First-party or server-side analytics are not detectable from the outside, so this may already be handled.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's rankingBoth
When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs (think tracking parameters or session IDs), Google can split your ranking signal across them. A single canonical tag tells Google which version counts.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowLinks to this page will look bare when sharedBoth
The page is missing its Open Graph title and image, so when someone shares it on Facebook, LinkedIn, iMessage, or Slack the preview has no title and image. A flat grey link gets far fewer clicks than one with an image and headline.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo structured data for rich search resultsBoth
The page has no schema.org markup. Adding the right type (Product, Article, Organization, FAQ) lets Google show rich results like star ratings and prices, which lift click-through for free.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
Low2 form fields missing autocomplete hintBothConversionAccessibility (WCAG)
Browsers can autofill name, email, phone, address from the user's saved profile only when you tell them which field is which via autocomplete="email", autocomplete="name", etc. Faster checkout, fewer typos.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo llms.txt fileBothSEO
No /llms.txt. Optional: some AI tools read this file (Anthropic, Vercel, Stripe, Cloudflare and Hugging Face publish one, and AI coding assistants use it to find docs), so adding one is a cheap courtesy to them. Google has said in writing that Google Search and its AI features do not use llms.txt, so do not expect a search-ranking or AI Overviews benefit from it.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
HighSome text is low-contrast and hard to readBothAccessibility (WCAG)
Text that does not stand out enough from its background is hard to read for many visitors, and fails accessibility guidelines Google checks.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
Low2 generic CTA links/buttons ("Click here", "Learn more", "Submit")BothAccessibility (WCAG)Conversion
Screen-reader users hear a list of "click here, click here, learn more" with no context. Sighted users learn nothing about where the link goes from the label alone. Rewrite each CTA to describe the destination ("See pricing", "Read the case study").
The exact elements we found:
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowHeadings skip levelsBothAccessibility (WCAG)
Skipping a heading level breaks the document outline that screen readers and search engines rely on. On this page the outline jumps to an H3 without the level above it, at "Keeping you connected". Lighthouse flagged 1 heading out of order.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT

Accessibility findings are automated checks against Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 and 2.2. They flag potential barriers and legal risk, not a certification or a determination of compliance with the ADA, Section 508, or EN 301 549. Automated testing catches only a subset of issues; a full conformance review needs manual and assistive-technology testing by a qualified reviewer.

From finding to fix
Want the fix, not just the finding?
Install Harvv and we turn each issue above into a ready-to-paste prompt for your AI coding assistant. Drop it into Cursor, Claude, or Copilot and the diagnosis becomes a concrete code change, written against this exact page.
Get the fix prompts

"How we know": unlabeled = a deterministic fact, identical on every load (e.g. element sizes). Most findings are this kind, so we only mark the exceptions: median across loads = a noisy lab metric, reported as a median. real-user field data = Google CrUX, actual Chrome visitors.

Structural and AI-search checks crawl up to 8 pages from your sitemap (a sample, not your full site). "Broken" means a link returned 404, 410, or 5xx, or did not respond; access-controlled pages (401, 403) are not counted.

01bTake the whole report to your AI

Every finding above in one payload, with the reasoning behind each one. The prompt is written to be pasted into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT. The JSON is for piping into your own tooling.

Includes the site context, what is already working (so your assistant does not "fix" it), and every finding with its severity, evidence, and why it matters.
Audit of https://mission-gateway.missiondigital.co.uk/, run September 8, 2026. 18 issues were found. I want them fixed.

## Context
- Site: https://mission-gateway.missiondigital.co.uk/
- Mobile LCP (lab median): 412 ms
- Desktop LCP (lab median): 1090 ms
- Tap targets under 44px: 67% (4 of 6)
- Evidence base: 4 mobile + 2 desktop loads

## Already working, do not change these
- Speed is good: The main content paints in about 0.4s in our test loads, inside Google's 2.5s "good" threshold. Real networks are slower, but the page itself is not heavy.
- Layout holds on phone and desktop: Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

## Issues, most damaging first

### 1. [HIGH] Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile
Affects: mobile only
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Conversion
Why it matters: 4 of 6 tappable items on this page (67%) measure under 24 pixels on their shorter side, below the 24px floor WCAG 2.5.8 sets for accessibility and well under the platform minimums (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp) for reliable tapping, and the same ones came up small on every test load. When visitors can't hit what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave instead of trying again.
Exact elements found: a 25x18 "here", a 48x20 "Instagram", a 48x20 "LinkedIn", a 98x15 "missiondigital.co.uk"

### 2. [HIGH] 3 form fields have no label
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Conversion, Tracking
Why it matters: Screen readers can't announce these fields, and a sighted user who clears the placeholder can't recover the prompt. Wrap each input in <label>…</label> or add aria-label.
Exact elements found: name="fullname" (input) placeholder="Full name*", name="email" (input) placeholder="Email*", name="phone" (input) placeholder="Phone number*"

### 3. [HIGH] Add quotations so AI engines cite this page
Category: AI Search, SEO
Why it matters: Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 1 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)

### 4. [HIGH] Some text is low-contrast and hard to read
Category: Accessibility (WCAG)
Why it matters: Text that does not stand out enough from its background is hard to read for many visitors, and fails accessibility guidelines Google checks.
Exact elements found: a.login-btn "Login": 2.53:1, needs 4.5:1 (rgb(255, 255, 255) on rgb(0, 174, 239)), p.fade-item "Mission is proud to be certi": 2.99:1, needs 4.5:1 (rgb(255, 255, 255) on rgb(10, 160, 216))

### 5. [MEDIUM] JavaScript crashed while the page was loading
Category: Conversion, Tracking
Why it matters: 1 script error fired during page load. When a script crashes, buttons sometimes stop working, analytics stop firing, and the visitor has no warning. Worth opening the browser console to find which script failed.
Exact elements found: NAV: Navigation timeout of 45000 ms exceeded
How we know: median across loads

### 6. [MEDIUM] Google is writing your search snippet for you
Category: SEO
Why it matters: This page has no meta description, so Google grabs whatever text it finds on the page and shows that under your title in search results. Usually it's not the pitch you'd write yourself. Adding a 120 to 160 character summary is one of the easier wins for search click-through.

### 7. [LOW] Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)
Category: Performance, SEO
Why it matters: 29 of 29 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift.
Exact elements found (6 of 29): mission_logo_blue_2000px_kx2nxi.png "Mission logo", ipad_updated_graphic_mgrsia.png "iPad", Iphone_asset_xkqqhu.png "iPhone", diagram_Asset_ttlsmv.png "Gateway diagram", globe_spin_animation_asset_fhqbbd_sphwpb.webp, TPN_Logo_yacuje.png "TPN Logo"

### 8. [LOW] The page is heavy to download
Category: Performance
Why it matters: Total page weight is high. On a phone with patchy data, that is extra seconds of blank screen before the page is usable. Lighthouse measured: Total size was 11,626 KiB.

### 9. [LOW] No visible contact details (email or phone)
Category: Conversion
Why it matters: This page exposes no email address, no phone link, no contact form and no link to a contact page. For higher-value or trust-sensitive purchases, a clear way to reach a human reduces hesitation. A contact route that only appears after JavaScript runs, or that lives on a page not checked here, will not be visible to this check. Add an email or phone link in the header or footer.

### 10. [LOW] Search-result title is leaving room on the table
Category: SEO
Why it matters: Google gives you about 60 characters of headline space in search results. This page is using 15. Adding the value proposition or a relevant keyword gives someone one more reason to click.

### 11. [LOW] No third-party analytics tag detected
Category: Tracking
Why it matters: No Google Analytics, GA4, or other third-party analytics tag was found in the page. If you rely only on platform or server-side analytics that is fine; but if not, a third-party tag is the baseline way to see how many visitors arrive, where they come from, and what converts. First-party or server-side analytics are not detectable from the outside, so this may already be handled.

### 12. [LOW] No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's ranking
Why it matters: When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs (think tracking parameters or session IDs), Google can split your ranking signal across them. A single canonical tag tells Google which version counts.

### 13. [LOW] Links to this page will look bare when shared
Why it matters: The page is missing its Open Graph title and image, so when someone shares it on Facebook, LinkedIn, iMessage, or Slack the preview has no title and image. A flat grey link gets far fewer clicks than one with an image and headline.

### 14. [LOW] No structured data for rich search results
Why it matters: The page has no schema.org markup. Adding the right type (Product, Article, Organization, FAQ) lets Google show rich results like star ratings and prices, which lift click-through for free.

### 15. [LOW] 2 form fields missing autocomplete hint
Category: Conversion, Accessibility (WCAG)
Why it matters: Browsers can autofill name, email, phone, address from the user's saved profile only when you tell them which field is which via autocomplete="email", autocomplete="name", etc. Faster checkout, fewer typos.
Exact elements found: name="email" (type=email), name="phone" (type=tel)

### 16. [LOW] No llms.txt file
Category: SEO
Why it matters: No /llms.txt. Optional: some AI tools read this file (Anthropic, Vercel, Stripe, Cloudflare and Hugging Face publish one, and AI coding assistants use it to find docs), so adding one is a cheap courtesy to them. Google has said in writing that Google Search and its AI features do not use llms.txt, so do not expect a search-ranking or AI Overviews benefit from it.

### 17. [LOW] 2 generic CTA links/buttons ("Click here", "Learn more", "Submit")
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Conversion
Why it matters: Screen-reader users hear a list of "click here, click here, learn more" with no context. Sighted users learn nothing about where the link goes from the label alone. Rewrite each CTA to describe the destination ("See pricing", "Read the case study").
Exact elements found: "here" (a), "Send" (button)

### 18. [LOW] Headings skip levels
Category: Accessibility (WCAG)
Why it matters: Skipping a heading level breaks the document outline that screen readers and search engines rely on. On this page the outline jumps to an H3 without the level above it, at "Keeping you connected". Lighthouse flagged 1 heading out of order.

## How to respond
Work through the issues in order. For each one give me the specific change that fixes it: real code or real copy, not advice. Keep changes minimal and match the existing style of the site.
Where several issues share one root cause, say so and fix it once rather than patching each symptom.
If an issue cannot be fixed without seeing more of the code, say exactly which file or selector you need instead of guessing.
18 findings, ready to paste

02Performance: phone, desktop, and real visitors

MetricMobileDesktopRead
TTFB (lab median)102 ms60 msLab
FCP (lab median)286 ms256 msLab
LCP (lab median)412 ms1.1sGood
Page weight (median)not measurednot measuredOK

Google Lighthouse (lab): Performance 34 (mobile), SEO 83, Accessibility 88, Best Practices 100.

Lab numbers are from a headless mobile browser on an unthrottled connection: treat them as a floor, not a typical experience. Add a Google API key to light up real-user field data (CrUX) and Lighthouse scores.

03Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile

4 of 6 tappable items on this page come in below the platform minimums for reliable tapping on a phone (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp; WCAG 2.5.8 sets 24px as the hard accessibility floor). The same ones came up small on every one of the 4 test loads, so this is the page itself, not a fluke.

When customers can't tap what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave. They don't file a bug. They don't try again. They just leave. A desktop dashboard can't see this because it's the difference between a thumb and a cursor.

The buttons measuring below the minimum on this scan:

  • a 25x18 "here"
  • a 48x20 "Instagram"
  • a 48x20 "LinkedIn"
  • a 98x15 "missiondigital.co.uk"

The fix is CSS-only on most sites: add padding around the icon (don't just change the icon size) so the actual tap area is at least 44×44 pixels. No redesign, no new assets.

04Technical SEO & structured data

CheckResult
TitleMission Gateway (15 chars)
Meta descriptionMissing
H11 on page
CanonicalMissing
Structured data (JSON-LD)None
Open GraphIncomplete

05The fix checklist

Everything to fix, priority first, each tagged with the screen it affects and a rough effort. Work top to bottom.

  1. Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobileMobileCSS only
  2. JavaScript crashed while the page was loadingBothDev afternoon
  3. Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothCSS only
  4. The page is heavy to downloadBothSmall
  5. 3 form fields have no labelBothVaries
  6. No visible contact details (email or phone)BothVaries
  7. Add quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothVaries
  8. Google is writing your search snippet for youBoth1 line
  9. Search-result title is leaving room on the tableBoth1 line
  10. No third-party analytics tag detectedBothDev afternoon
  11. No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's rankingBoth1 line
  12. Links to this page will look bare when sharedBoth1 line
  13. No structured data for rich search resultsBothVaries
  14. 2 form fields missing autocomplete hintBothVaries
  15. No llms.txt fileBothVaries
  16. Some text is low-contrast and hard to readBothVaries
  17. 2 generic CTA links/buttons ("Click here", "Learn more", "Submit")BothVaries
  18. Headings skip levelsBothVaries

Effort is a rough read from the outside: "CSS only" means no new assets or backend work, "1 line" means a single tag, "Dev afternoon" means a developer needs to touch tracking or scripts.

06What this report cannot tell you

Everything above is from the outside, looking at the page on a simulated phone and desktop. The questions that actually decide revenue need real visitors. Install the Harvv pixel (one script tag, 16 KB, zero personal data, no engineering project) and within about 72 hours you'd know which buttons real customers tapped and missed, how often Google Analytics is missing visits, and exactly where mobile shoppers stalled and left. This report shows you where to look. The pixel shows you how often it happens, and to whom.

What to do next
See this same depth on your real visitors, every day.

Drop the Harvv pixel on mission-gateway.missiondigital.co.uk and we turn this one-off scan into ongoing measured behavior: which taps miss, where sessions stall, and the real drop rates. Free to start, no card needed.

Add the pixel free

07How we did this, and what it can't prove

  • 4 mobile + 2 desktop loads of one URL from headless Chrome (iPhone viewport at 390px, desktop at 1366px), September 8, 2026. Enough loads to separate real defects from random noise, not a full-site crawl.
  • Lab numbers, not real-user numbers (no field data was available for this run). Real devices on real networks run slower.
  • Friction is inferred, not counted. We can prove a button is small. We can't, from the outside, count how often it causes a missed tap. That requires the pixel on a live page.

About Harvv, the source of this teardown

Harvv is a behavioral UX analytics platform (harvv.com). A lightweight JavaScript pixel captures how real visitors behave on a site (dead clicks, rage clicks, scroll depth, Core Web Vitals, JavaScript errors, and 50+ other signals) and the engine turns them into prioritized, plain-English findings. This teardown is the outside-in version of that: the same detectors run against a public page, with no pixel installed.

How to read it. Every finding here is a reproducible, automated measurement, not an opinion: element sizes, contrast ratios, load metrics, and structured-data checks that anyone can re-run against the same URL. The method is stated in full above. Automated testing catches a subset of issues, so this is a starting point, not a certification.

Full disclosure. Harvv makes the pixel that would measure the friction these findings imply, so we have a commercial interest. That is exactly why the findings are kept to things a reader can verify independently, and why nothing here is inflated: an unreproducible claim would undermine the tool it is meant to demonstrate.

Prepared by Harvv (harvv.com), a behavioral UX analytics platform. Last updated September 8, 2026.

Eco Host
Behavioral teardown
Vibhinngautam
Behavioral teardown
Ysdev Ca
Behavioral teardown
Cluely
Behavioral teardown

See all site teardowns →

harvv://this-page live
Scroll depth how far you read0%
Dead clicks clicks that did nothing0
Rage clicks frustration bursts0
Interactions clicks that worked0
event log · live