Mwjsautomations: a phone-and-desktop teardown
We loaded https://mwjsautomations.com/ 4 times on a simulated iPhone and 2 more on a 1366px desktop, and wrote down what a real visitor would see on each. No login, no insider access, no Harvv pixel needed. Here is what repeated visits already show, sorted by how we know it.
TL;DRWhat jumped out
Of everything we found on this scan, this is the one to start with: 3 form fields have no label. Screen readers can't announce these fields, and a sighted user who clears the placeholder can't recover the prompt. Wrap each input in <label>…</label> or add aria-label.
Below: what's already working, every finding ranked by impact and tagged with the screen it affects, the speed numbers on phone and desktop, and a checklist of what to fix first.
00What's already working
Start here so the problems below are in context. These held up across the test loads:
- Speed is good. Google Lighthouse scores this page 97/100 for performance on mobile. Loading is not what is costing you visitors here.
- Light page weight. The page is about 0.0 MB across 6 requests. That keeps it quick on mobile data and cheap to load repeatedly.
- No JavaScript errors on load. Nothing threw a script error across the test loads, so buttons and tracking are not silently breaking mid-session.
- Search basics are in place. Lighthouse scores SEO 100/100. The fundamentals Google looks for are present.
- Layout holds on phone and desktop. Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.
01Findings, ranked by what hurts conversion most
| Severity | Finding | How we know |
|---|---|---|
| High | 3 form fields have no labelBothAccessibility (WCAG)ConversionTracking Screen readers can't announce these fields, and a sighted user who clears the placeholder can't recover the prompt. Wrap each input in <label>…</label> or add aria-label. | identical every load |
| High | Some text is low-contrast and hard to readBothAccessibility (WCAG) Text that does not stand out enough from its background is hard to read for many visitors, and fails accessibility guidelines Google checks. | identical every load |
| High | Some buttons have no accessible nameBothAccessibility (WCAG)Tracking A button with only an icon and no label is announced as "button" by screen readers, giving no idea what it does. | identical every load |
| Medium | No analytics installed, so you cannot see your own trafficBothTracking No Google Analytics, GA4, or any analytics tag was detected. There is no way to know how many visitors arrive, where they come from, or what converts, and no data to retarget or measure a campaign against. Installing GA4 (free) is the baseline. | identical every load |
| Medium | AI search crawlers are blockedBothSEO Your robots.txt blocks 8 AI crawlers (gptbot, google-extended, claudebot, ccbot, bytespider, applebot-extended, amazonbot, meta-externalagent). Those engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude) cannot read your site, so your content cannot be cited or shown in AI search. The exact examples we found:
| identical every load |
| Low | Search-result title is leaving room on the tableBothSEO Google gives you about 60 characters of headline space in search results. This page is using 16. Adding the value proposition or a relevant keyword gives someone one more reason to click. | identical every load |
| Low | No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's rankingBoth When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs (think tracking parameters or session IDs), Google can split your ranking signal across them. A single canonical tag tells Google which version counts. | identical every load |
| Low | Links to this page will look bare when sharedBoth The page is missing its Open Graph title and image, so when someone shares it on Facebook, LinkedIn, iMessage, or Slack the preview has no title and image. A flat grey link gets far fewer clicks than one with an image and headline. | identical every load |
| Low | 2 form fields missing autocomplete hintBothConversionAccessibility (WCAG) Browsers can autofill name, email, phone, address from the user's saved profile only when you tell them which field is which via autocomplete="email", autocomplete="name", etc. Faster checkout, fewer typos. The exact elements we found: | identical every load |
| Low | No email capture or newsletter detectedBothConversion No email-marketing tag (Klaviyo, Mailchimp, etc.) was found. Email capture plus a welcome and abandoned-cart flow is consistently the highest-ROI addition for a small store, and it is owned audience you keep regardless of ad costs. | identical every load |
| Low | No llms.txt fileBothSEO No /llms.txt. This emerging standard gives AI search engines a clean, structured map of your most important content, improving how they understand and cite your site. | identical every load |
Accessibility findings are automated checks against Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 and 2.2. They flag potential barriers and legal risk, not a certification or a determination of compliance with the ADA, Section 508, or EN 301 549. Automated testing catches only a subset of issues; a full conformance review needs manual and assistive-technology testing by a qualified reviewer.
"How we know": identical every load = a deterministic fact (e.g. element sizes). median across loads = a noisy lab metric, reported as a median. real-user field data = Google CrUX, actual Chrome visitors.
Structural and AI-search checks crawl up to 8 pages from your sitemap (a sample, not your full site). "Broken" means a link returned 404, 410, or 5xx, or did not respond; access-controlled pages (401, 403) are not counted.
02Performance: phone, desktop, and real visitors
| Metric | Mobile | Desktop | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB (lab median) | 50 ms | 111 ms | Lab |
| FCP (lab median) | 158 ms | 228 ms | Lab |
| LCP (lab median) | 158 ms | 228 ms | Good |
| Page weight (median) | 0.0 MB | 0.0 MB | OK |
Google Lighthouse (lab): Performance 97 mobile / 100 desktop, SEO 100, Accessibility 83, Best Practices 100.
Lab numbers are from a headless mobile browser on an unthrottled connection: treat them as a floor, not a typical experience. Add a Google API key to light up real-user field data (CrUX) and Lighthouse scores.
03Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile
3 of 10 tappable items on this page come in below 44×44 pixels, the size Apple and Google both recommend for reliable tapping on a phone. The same ones came up small on every one of the 4 test loads, so this is the page itself, not a fluke.
The buttons measuring below the minimum on this scan:
- button 24x24 (no visible label)
- button 137x28 "just let me know"
- a 227x20 "max@mwjsautomations.com"
The fix is CSS-only on most sites: add padding around the icon (don't just change the icon size) so the actual tap area is at least 44×44 pixels. No redesign, no new assets.
04Technical SEO & structured data
| Check | Result |
|---|---|
| Title | MWJS Automations (16 chars) |
| Meta description | 120 chars |
| H1 | 1 on page |
| Canonical | Missing |
| Structured data (JSON-LD) | 1 block(s) |
| Open Graph | Incomplete |
05The fix checklist
Everything to fix, priority first, each tagged with the screen it affects and a rough effort. Work top to bottom.
- 3 form fields have no labelBothVaries
- Some text is low-contrast and hard to readBothVaries
- Some buttons have no accessible nameBothVaries
- No analytics installed, so you cannot see your own trafficBothDev afternoon
- AI search crawlers are blockedBothVaries
- Search-result title is leaving room on the tableBoth1 line
- No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's rankingBoth1 line
- Links to this page will look bare when sharedBoth1 line
- 2 form fields missing autocomplete hintBothVaries
- No email capture or newsletter detectedBothVaries
- No llms.txt fileBothVaries
Effort is a rough read from the outside: "CSS only" means no new assets or backend work, "1 line" means a single tag, "Dev afternoon" means a developer needs to touch tracking or scripts.
06What this report cannot tell you
Everything above is from the outside, looking at the page on a simulated phone and desktop. The questions that actually decide revenue need real visitors. Install the Harvv pixel (one script tag, 16 KB, zero personal data, no engineering project) and within about 72 hours you'd know which buttons real customers tapped and missed, how often Google Analytics is missing visits, and exactly where mobile shoppers stalled and left. This report shows you where to look. The pixel shows you how often it happens, and to whom.
Drop the Harvv pixel on mwjsautomations.com and we turn this one-off scan into ongoing measured behavior: which taps miss, where sessions stall, and the real drop rates. Free to start, no card needed.
Add the pixel free07How we did this, and what it can't prove
- 4 mobile + 2 desktop loads of one URL from headless Chrome (iPhone viewport at 390px, desktop at 1366px), June 29, 2026. Enough loads to separate real defects from random noise, not a full-site crawl.
- Lab numbers, not real-user numbers (no field data was available for this run). Real devices on real networks run slower.
- Friction is inferred, not counted. We can prove a button is small. We can't, from the outside, count how often it causes a missed tap. That requires the pixel on a live page.
Prepared by Harvv. Last updated June 29, 2026.