Site teardown · Shreyeahhs Vercel
shreyeahhs.vercel.app
Site health · August 30, 2026
Prepared by Harvv

What your site is actually doing.

One page: what is working, what is costing you visitors, and what to fix next. A phone-and-desktop teardown of the live site: 4 phone loads + 2 desktop loads. No login, no insider access, no Harvv pixel needed. The full evidence is at the bottom.

August 30, 2026·External scan·4 mobile + 2 desktop loads · no pixel data·Download as PDF

Working

What's already working. These held up across every load.

0.4s

Speed is good.

0.4MB

The page is about 0.4 MB across 10 requests. That keeps it quick on mobile data and cheap to load repeatedly.

0

No JavaScript errors on load.

100/100

Lighthouse scores SEO 100/100. The fundamentals Google looks for are present.

100/100

Lighthouse accessibility is 100/100, so screen-reader and contrast basics are largely handled.

Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

Costing you

Ranked by what hurts conversion most. Full evidence below.

3

A floating widget is covering a clickable element

SEO

The site runs on a platform subdomain, not its own domain

9/27

Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile

fix

Security headers are missing or weak

2/2

Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)

315

Unused JavaScript is being downloaded

Fixing next
obscured control, tap targets and image sizes.

3 small changes, on the pages people actually land on: A floating widget is covering a clickable element; Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile; Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now). We re-measure the same samples after.

3
hours

01Findings, ranked by what hurts conversion most

SeverityFindingHow we know
HighA floating widget is covering a clickable elementBothConversionAccessibility (WCAG)
3 clickable elements are sitting underneath a fixed overlay (div.space-y-3 over a "See in 3D"), so a visitor who tries to tap them hits the widget on top instead. The element is there and looks fine in a preview, it just can't be reached. Move the floating widget to a clear corner, lower its z-index, or add spacing so it never overlaps your links and buttons.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumTiny buttons are hard to tap on mobileMobileAccessibility (WCAG)Conversion
9 of 27 tappable items on this page (33%) measure under 24 pixels on their shorter side, below the 24px floor WCAG 2.5.8 sets for accessibility and well under the platform minimums (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp) for reliable tapping, and the same ones came up small on every test load. When visitors can't hit what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave instead of trying again.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowImages have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothPerformanceSEO
2 of 2 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowUnused JavaScript is being downloadedBothPerformance
Code that never runs on this page still costs download and parse time on every visit. Splitting or removing it speeds up load. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 315 KiB.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowUnused CSS is being downloadedBothPerformance
Style rules that this page never uses still block rendering while they download. Trimming them frees the paint path. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 12 KiB.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo email capture or newsletter detectedBothConversion
No email input field was found in the page, and no email-marketing tag (Klaviyo, Mailchimp, Substack, ConvertKit, Beehiiv, MailerLite, ActiveCampaign, Omnisend, Brevo, Drip or Buttondown) was detected. A form that loads after JavaScript runs, or one behind a popup or a separate page, will not be visible to this check. If capturing visitors is relevant to this site, an email signup builds an owned audience you keep regardless of ad costs. Not every site needs one.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
HighThe site runs on a platform subdomain, not its own domainBothSEOConversion
Visitors see "shreyeahhs.vercel.app" in the address bar instead of a custom domain. It reads as unfinished, weakens brand recall and trust (especially for higher-value purchases), and splits SEO authority with the platform. Register a domain and set it as the primary so the vercel.app URL redirects to it.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowSearch-result title is leaving room on the tableBothSEO
Google gives you about 60 characters of headline space in search results. This page is using 17. Adding the value proposition or a relevant keyword gives someone one more reason to click.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo third-party analytics tag detectedBothTracking
No Google Analytics, GA4, or other third-party analytics tag was found in the page. If you rely only on platform or server-side analytics that is fine; but if not, a third-party tag is the baseline way to see how many visitors arrive, where they come from, and what converts. First-party or server-side analytics are not detectable from the outside, so this may already be handled.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's rankingBoth
When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs (think tracking parameters or session IDs), Google can split your ranking signal across them. A single canonical tag tells Google which version counts.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowNo structured data for rich search resultsBoth
The page has no schema.org markup. Adding the right type (Product, Article, Organization, FAQ) lets Google show rich results like star ratings and prices, which lift click-through for free.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowSitemap not listed in robots.txtBoth
A sitemap exists but is not referenced in robots.txt. Adding a "Sitemap:" line to robots.txt helps crawlers find it reliably.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumSecurity headers are missing or weakBothSecurity
The server response is missing browser-hardening headers that protect visitors and are a standard security and agency checklist item. Missing or weak here: Content-Security-Policy (the main defense against injected and cross-site scripts); clickjacking protection (X-Frame-Options or a CSP frame-ancestors rule); X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff (stops MIME-type sniffing attacks). These are set at the server, CDN, or host level (most platforms expose them in settings or a config file) and do not change how the site looks or performs.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT

Accessibility findings are automated checks against Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 and 2.2. They flag potential barriers and legal risk, not a certification or a determination of compliance with the ADA, Section 508, or EN 301 549. Automated testing catches only a subset of issues; a full conformance review needs manual and assistive-technology testing by a qualified reviewer.

From finding to fix
Want the fix, not just the finding?
Install Harvv and we turn each issue above into a ready-to-paste prompt for your AI coding assistant. Drop it into Cursor, Claude, or Copilot and the diagnosis becomes a concrete code change, written against this exact page.
Get the fix prompts

"How we know": unlabeled = a deterministic fact, identical on every load (e.g. element sizes). Most findings are this kind, so we only mark the exceptions: median across loads = a noisy lab metric, reported as a median. real-user field data = Google CrUX, actual Chrome visitors.

Structural and AI-search checks crawl up to 8 pages from your sitemap (a sample, not your full site). "Broken" means a link returned 404, 410, or 5xx, or did not respond; access-controlled pages (401, 403) are not counted.

01bTake the whole report to your AI

Every finding above in one payload, with the reasoning behind each one. The prompt is written to be pasted into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT. The JSON is for piping into your own tooling.

Includes the site context, what is already working (so your assistant does not "fix" it), and every finding with its severity, evidence, and why it matters.
Audit of https://shreyeahhs.vercel.app/, run August 30, 2026. 13 issues were found. I want them fixed.

## Context
- Site: https://shreyeahhs.vercel.app/
- Mobile LCP (lab median): 386 ms
- Desktop LCP (lab median): 1400 ms
- Page weight (median): 0.4 MB
- Tap targets under 44px: 33% (9 of 27)
- Evidence base: 4 mobile + 2 desktop loads

## Already working, do not change these
- Speed is good: The main content paints in about 0.4s in our test loads, inside Google's 2.5s "good" threshold. Real networks are slower, but the page itself is not heavy.
- Light page weight: The page is about 0.4 MB across 10 requests. That keeps it quick on mobile data and cheap to load repeatedly.
- No JavaScript errors on load: Nothing threw a script error across the test loads, so buttons and tracking are not silently breaking mid-session.
- Search basics are in place: Lighthouse scores SEO 100/100. The fundamentals Google looks for are present.
- Accessible to most visitors: Lighthouse accessibility is 100/100, so screen-reader and contrast basics are largely handled.
- Layout holds on phone and desktop: Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

## Issues, most damaging first

### 1. [HIGH] A floating widget is covering a clickable element
Category: Conversion, Accessibility (WCAG)
Why it matters: 3 clickable elements are sitting underneath a fixed overlay (div.space-y-3 over a "See in 3D"), so a visitor who tries to tap them hits the widget on top instead. The element is there and looks fine in a preview, it just can't be reached. Move the floating widget to a clear corner, lower its z-index, or add spacing so it never overlaps your links and buttons.
Exact elements found: a "See in 3D" under div.space-y-3, button "See in 3D" under div.space-y-3, a "Code" under div.text-[hsl(var(--accent))]

### 2. [HIGH] The site runs on a platform subdomain, not its own domain
Category: SEO, Conversion
Why it matters: Visitors see "shreyeahhs.vercel.app" in the address bar instead of a custom domain. It reads as unfinished, weakens brand recall and trust (especially for higher-value purchases), and splits SEO authority with the platform. Register a domain and set it as the primary so the vercel.app URL redirects to it.

### 3. [MEDIUM] Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile
Affects: mobile only
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Conversion
Why it matters: 9 of 27 tappable items on this page (33%) measure under 24 pixels on their shorter side, below the 24px floor WCAG 2.5.8 sets for accessibility and well under the platform minimums (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp) for reliable tapping, and the same ones came up small on every test load. When visitors can't hit what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave instead of trying again.
Exact elements found: button 72x16 "Skip (Esc)", a 45x16 "Live", a 45x16 "Code", a 45x16 "Code", a 45x16 "Code", a 45x16 "Code", a 20x20 "GitHub", a 20x20 "LinkedIn"

### 4. [MEDIUM] Security headers are missing or weak
Category: Security
Why it matters: The server response is missing browser-hardening headers that protect visitors and are a standard security and agency checklist item. Missing or weak here: Content-Security-Policy (the main defense against injected and cross-site scripts); clickjacking protection (X-Frame-Options or a CSP frame-ancestors rule); X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff (stops MIME-type sniffing attacks). These are set at the server, CDN, or host level (most platforms expose them in settings or a config file) and do not change how the site looks or performs.

### 5. [LOW] Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)
Category: Performance, SEO
Why it matters: 2 of 2 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift.
Exact elements found: avatar.png "Avatar", living-ecosystem-simulator.png "Living Ecosystem Simulat"

### 6. [LOW] Unused JavaScript is being downloaded
Category: Performance
Why it matters: Code that never runs on this page still costs download and parse time on every visit. Splitting or removing it speeds up load. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 315 KiB.

### 7. [LOW] Unused CSS is being downloaded
Category: Performance
Why it matters: Style rules that this page never uses still block rendering while they download. Trimming them frees the paint path. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 12 KiB.

### 8. [LOW] No email capture or newsletter detected
Category: Conversion
Why it matters: No email input field was found in the page, and no email-marketing tag (Klaviyo, Mailchimp, Substack, ConvertKit, Beehiiv, MailerLite, ActiveCampaign, Omnisend, Brevo, Drip or Buttondown) was detected. A form that loads after JavaScript runs, or one behind a popup or a separate page, will not be visible to this check. If capturing visitors is relevant to this site, an email signup builds an owned audience you keep regardless of ad costs. Not every site needs one.

### 9. [LOW] Search-result title is leaving room on the table
Category: SEO
Why it matters: Google gives you about 60 characters of headline space in search results. This page is using 17. Adding the value proposition or a relevant keyword gives someone one more reason to click.

### 10. [LOW] No third-party analytics tag detected
Category: Tracking
Why it matters: No Google Analytics, GA4, or other third-party analytics tag was found in the page. If you rely only on platform or server-side analytics that is fine; but if not, a third-party tag is the baseline way to see how many visitors arrive, where they come from, and what converts. First-party or server-side analytics are not detectable from the outside, so this may already be handled.

### 11. [LOW] No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's ranking
Why it matters: When the same content is reachable at multiple URLs (think tracking parameters or session IDs), Google can split your ranking signal across them. A single canonical tag tells Google which version counts.

### 12. [LOW] No structured data for rich search results
Why it matters: The page has no schema.org markup. Adding the right type (Product, Article, Organization, FAQ) lets Google show rich results like star ratings and prices, which lift click-through for free.

### 13. [LOW] Sitemap not listed in robots.txt
Why it matters: A sitemap exists but is not referenced in robots.txt. Adding a "Sitemap:" line to robots.txt helps crawlers find it reliably.

## How to respond
Work through the issues in order. For each one give me the specific change that fixes it: real code or real copy, not advice. Keep changes minimal and match the existing style of the site.
Where several issues share one root cause, say so and fix it once rather than patching each symptom.
If an issue cannot be fixed without seeing more of the code, say exactly which file or selector you need instead of guessing.
13 findings, ready to paste

02Performance: phone, desktop, and real visitors

MetricMobileDesktopRead
TTFB (lab median)22 ms14 msLab
FCP (lab median)366 ms372 msLab
LCP (lab median)386 ms1.4sGood
Page weight (median)0.4 MB0.4 MBOK

Google Lighthouse (lab): Performance 68 mobile / 97 desktop, SEO 100, Accessibility 100, Best Practices 100.

Lab numbers are from a headless mobile browser on an unthrottled connection: treat them as a floor, not a typical experience. Add a Google API key to light up real-user field data (CrUX) and Lighthouse scores.

03Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile

9 of 27 tappable items on this page come in below the platform minimums for reliable tapping on a phone (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp; WCAG 2.5.8 sets 24px as the hard accessibility floor). The same ones came up small on every one of the 4 test loads, so this is the page itself, not a fluke.

When customers can't tap what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave. They don't file a bug. They don't try again. They just leave. A desktop dashboard can't see this because it's the difference between a thumb and a cursor.

The buttons measuring below the minimum on this scan:

  • button 72x16 "Skip (Esc)"
  • a 45x16 "Live"
  • a 45x16 "Code"
  • a 45x16 "Code"
  • a 45x16 "Code"
  • a 45x16 "Code"
  • a 20x20 "GitHub"
  • a 20x20 "LinkedIn"

The fix is CSS-only on most sites: add padding around the icon (don't just change the icon size) so the actual tap area is at least 44×44 pixels. No redesign, no new assets.

04Technical SEO & structured data

CheckResult
TitleShreyas Portfolio (17 chars)
Meta description131 chars
H11 on page
CanonicalMissing
Structured data (JSON-LD)None
Open GraphTitle + image

05The fix checklist

Everything to fix, priority first, each tagged with the screen it affects and a rough effort. Work top to bottom.

  1. A floating widget is covering a clickable elementBothCSS only
  2. Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobileMobileCSS only
  3. Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothCSS only
  4. Unused JavaScript is being downloadedBothVaries
  5. Unused CSS is being downloadedBothVaries
  6. No email capture or newsletter detectedBothVaries
  7. The site runs on a platform subdomain, not its own domainBothVaries
  8. Search-result title is leaving room on the tableBoth1 line
  9. No third-party analytics tag detectedBothDev afternoon
  10. No canonical tag, so duplicate URLs split the page's rankingBoth1 line
  11. No structured data for rich search resultsBothVaries
  12. Sitemap not listed in robots.txtBothVaries
  13. Security headers are missing or weakBothVaries

Effort is a rough read from the outside: "CSS only" means no new assets or backend work, "1 line" means a single tag, "Dev afternoon" means a developer needs to touch tracking or scripts.

06What this report cannot tell you

Everything above is from the outside, looking at the page on a simulated phone and desktop. The questions that actually decide revenue need real visitors. Install the Harvv pixel (one script tag, 16 KB, zero personal data, no engineering project) and within about 72 hours you'd know which buttons real customers tapped and missed, how often Google Analytics is missing visits, and exactly where mobile shoppers stalled and left. This report shows you where to look. The pixel shows you how often it happens, and to whom.

What to do next
See this same depth on your real visitors, every day.

Drop the Harvv pixel on shreyeahhs.vercel.app and we turn this one-off scan into ongoing measured behavior: which taps miss, where sessions stall, and the real drop rates. Free to start, no card needed.

Add the pixel free

07How we did this, and what it can't prove

  • 4 mobile + 2 desktop loads of one URL from headless Chrome (iPhone viewport at 390px, desktop at 1366px), August 30, 2026. Enough loads to separate real defects from random noise, not a full-site crawl.
  • Lab numbers, not real-user numbers (no field data was available for this run). Real devices on real networks run slower.
  • Friction is inferred, not counted. We can prove a button is small. We can't, from the outside, count how often it causes a missed tap. That requires the pixel on a live page.

About Harvv, the source of this teardown

Harvv is a behavioral UX analytics platform (harvv.com). A lightweight JavaScript pixel captures how real visitors behave on a site (dead clicks, rage clicks, scroll depth, Core Web Vitals, JavaScript errors, and 50+ other signals) and the engine turns them into prioritized, plain-English findings. This teardown is the outside-in version of that: the same detectors run against a public page, with no pixel installed.

How to read it. Every finding here is a reproducible, automated measurement, not an opinion: element sizes, contrast ratios, load metrics, and structured-data checks that anyone can re-run against the same URL. The method is stated in full above. Automated testing catches a subset of issues, so this is a starting point, not a certification.

Full disclosure. Harvv makes the pixel that would measure the friction these findings imply, so we have a commercial interest. That is exactly why the findings are kept to things a reader can verify independently, and why nothing here is inflated: an unreproducible claim would undermine the tool it is meant to demonstrate.

Prepared by Harvv (harvv.com), a behavioral UX analytics platform. Last updated August 30, 2026.

Related teardowns

Eco Host
Behavioral teardown
Vibhinngautam
Behavioral teardown
Forgeyourpathai
Behavioral teardown
Ysdev Ca
Behavioral teardown

See all site teardowns →

harvv://this-page live
Scroll depth how far you read0%
Dead clicks clicks that did nothing0
Rage clicks frustration bursts0
Interactions clicks that worked0
event log · live