Site teardown · Trynina
trynina.co
Site health · September 28, 2026
Prepared by Harvv

What your site is actually doing.

One page: what is working, what is costing you visitors, and what to fix next. A phone-and-desktop teardown of the live site: 6 phone loads + 3 desktop loads. No login, no insider access, no Harvv pixel needed. The full evidence is at the bottom.

September 28, 2026·External scan·6 mobile + 3 desktop loads · no pixel data·Download as PDF

Working

What's already working. These held up across every load.

0.2s

Speed is good.

100/100

Lighthouse scores SEO 100/100. The fundamentals Google looks for are present.

✓

Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

Costing you

Ranked by what hurts conversion most. Full evidence below.

19

19 form fields have no label

41%

Add quotations so AI engines cite this page

a11y

Some buttons have no accessible name

13/40

Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile

1

JavaScript crashed while the page was loading

2.2MB

Page is heavy and slow on mobile data

Fixing next
tap targets and page weight.

2 small changes, on the pages people actually land on: Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile; Page is heavy and slow on mobile data. We re-measure the same samples after.

3
hours
AI search visibility
How visible is trynina.co to AI search?
ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews are the new front page. The AI checks in this report are a preview. A free account turns them into a live 0 to 100 score, tracked daily and benchmarked against your competitors.
See the full AI report, free

01Findings, ranked by what hurts conversion most

SeverityFindingHow we know
MediumTiny buttons are hard to tap on mobileMobileAccessibility (WCAG)Conversion
13 of 40 tappable items on this page (33%) measure under 24 pixels on their shorter side, below the 24px floor WCAG 2.5.8 sets for accessibility and well under the platform minimums (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp) for reliable tapping, and the same ones came up small on every test load. When visitors can't hit what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave instead of trying again.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumJavaScript crashed while the page was loadingBothConversionTracking
1 script error fired during page load. When a script crashes, buttons sometimes stop working, analytics stop firing, and the visitor has no warning. Worth opening the browser console to find which script failed.
The exact errors we found:
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
median across loads
MediumPage is heavy and slow on mobile dataBothPerformance
Each visit downloads about 2.2 MB, roughly 1109 KB of images and 704 KB of JavaScript across 88 separate downloads. On a fast connection that's fine. On a phone with patchy mobile data, that's several seconds of blank screen before the page is readable.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
median across loads
LowImages have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothPerformanceSEO
17 of 25 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowUnused JavaScript is being downloadedBothPerformance
Code that never runs on this page still costs download and parse time on every visit. Splitting or removing it speeds up load. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 140 KiB.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
LowThe page loads from a lot of third-party servicesBoth
Around 28 separate outside domains load on this page (analytics, ads, chat widgets, fonts). Each one is a connection that can be slow, fail, or change behavior outside your control.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
median across loads
High19 form fields have no labelBothAccessibility (WCAG)ConversionTracking
Screen readers can't announce these fields, and a sighted user who clears the placeholder can't recover the prompt. Wrap each input in <label>…</label> or add aria-label.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
HighAdd quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothAI SearchSEO
Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 8 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumMeta Pixel sends only PageView on this pageBothTracking
On this page the Meta Pixel sends only PageView. That is expected on a homepage, but check that a conversion event (a standard one like Lead, Schedule or Purchase, or a custom event) fires when a visitor actually converts, or that a custom conversion is set up in Events Manager. This scan loads pages and never submits a form or books a call, so it cannot see events that fire on those actions. If nothing fires there, Meta can optimise your ads for page views only.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
Medium5 potential dead-click targetsBothConversionAccessibility (WCAG)Tracking
At phone and desktop width, in our test browser, these elements are styled with a pointer cursor, the page's own mark for something clickable. They are not a link or a button, have no button or link role, no tabindex and no click attribute, and nothing on or around them opens a menu. A click handler attached by a script is not visible to this check, so click one to confirm it does something. Examples: "pricing" (span.ns-pill), "how-to" (span.ns-pill), "reviews" (span.ns-pill).
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
Medium2 inputs use the wrong type attributeBothConversion
Mobile keyboards adapt to the input type (email shows @ key, tel shows numeric pad). Generic type="text" gets a generic keyboard and visitors mis-type. Switch to the correct type, or add a matching inputmode attribute if the native validation is too strict for what people type (bare domains in a URL field, for example).
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
HighSome buttons have no accessible nameBothAccessibility (WCAG)Tracking
A button with only an icon and no label is announced as "button" by screen readers, giving no idea what it does.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
MediumSecurity headers are missing or weakBothSecurity
The server response is missing browser-hardening headers that protect visitors and are a standard security and agency checklist item. Missing or weak here: Content-Security-Policy (the main defense against injected and cross-site scripts); clickjacking protection (X-Frame-Options or a CSP frame-ancestors rule); a stronger HSTS policy (max-age at least 180 days plus includeSubDomains); X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff (stops MIME-type sniffing attacks). These are set at the server, CDN, or host level (most platforms expose them in settings or a config file) and do not change how the site looks or performs.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT
Medium14 interactive elements have no stable, accessible identityBothAccessibility (WCAG)Tracking
These elements are clicked like buttons but expose no accessible name, or are a plain div/span used as a control with no role. Assistive tech announces only a role (or nothing), and analytics and heatmaps have no human-readable label or stable selector to bind the click to, so the click is both inaccessible and untrackable, and any redesign silently breaks click aggregation. Give each one a real <button>/<a>, an aria-label, and a stable id or data-attribute.
paste into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT

Accessibility findings are automated checks against Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 and 2.2. They flag potential barriers and legal risk, not a certification or a determination of compliance with the ADA, Section 508, or EN 301 549. Automated testing catches only a subset of issues; a full conformance review needs manual and assistive-technology testing by a qualified reviewer.

From finding to fix
Want the fix, not just the finding?
Install Harvv and we turn each issue above into a ready-to-paste prompt for your AI coding assistant. Drop it into Cursor, Claude, or Copilot and the diagnosis becomes a concrete code change, written against this exact page.
Get the fix prompts

"How we know": unlabeled = a deterministic fact, identical on every load (e.g. element sizes). Most findings are this kind, so we only mark the exceptions: median across loads = a noisy lab metric, reported as a median. real-user field data = Google CrUX, actual Chrome visitors.

Structural and AI-search checks crawl up to 8 pages from your sitemap (a sample, not your full site). "Broken" means a link returned 404, 410, or 5xx, or did not respond; access-controlled pages (401, 403) are not counted.

01bTake the whole report to your AI

Every finding above in one payload, with the reasoning behind each one. The prompt is written to be pasted into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT. The JSON is for piping into your own tooling.

Includes the site context, what is already working (so your assistant does not "fix" it), and every finding with its severity, evidence, and why it matters.
Audit of https://trynina.co/, run September 28, 2026. 14 issues were found. I want them fixed.

## Context
- Site: https://trynina.co/
- Mobile LCP (lab median): 158 ms
- Desktop LCP (lab median): 156 ms
- Page weight (median): 2.2 MB
- Tap targets under 44px: 33% (13 of 40)
- Evidence base: 6 mobile + 3 desktop loads

## Already working, do not change these
- Speed is good: The main content paints in about 0.2s in our test loads, inside Google's 2.5s "good" threshold. Real networks are slower, but the page itself is not heavy.
- Search basics are in place: Lighthouse scores SEO 100/100. The fundamentals Google looks for are present.
- Layout holds on phone and desktop: Nothing spilled past the edge at either 390px (phone) or 1366px (desktop), so the structure is responsive.

## Issues, most damaging first

### 1. [HIGH] 19 form fields have no label
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Conversion, Tracking
Why it matters: Screen readers can't announce these fields, and a sighted user who clears the placeholder can't recover the prompt. Wrap each input in <label>…</label> or add aria-label.
Exact elements found: name="firstname" (input) placeholder="Jordan", name="lastname" (input) placeholder="Reyes", name="company" (input) placeholder="Acme Co.", name="website" (input) placeholder="company.com", name="email" (input) placeholder="you@company.com"

### 2. [HIGH] Add quotations so AI engines cite this page
Category: AI Search, SEO
Why it matters: Generative engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) lift sourced, attributed quotes almost verbatim, and quotations are the single strongest citation lever (studies measure roughly +41%). Add 1-2 attributed expert quotes or blockquotes to the pages below. (Found across a sample of 8 pages from your sitemap, a partial crawl rather than your full site.)

### 3. [HIGH] Some buttons have no accessible name
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Tracking
Why it matters: A button with only an icon and no label is announced as "button" by screen readers, giving no idea what it does.

### 4. [MEDIUM] Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile
Affects: mobile only
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Conversion
Why it matters: 13 of 40 tappable items on this page (33%) measure under 24 pixels on their shorter side, below the 24px floor WCAG 2.5.8 sets for accessibility and well under the platform minimums (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp) for reliable tapping, and the same ones came up small on every test load. When visitors can't hit what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave instead of trying again.
Exact elements found (8 of 13): a 1x1 "Skip to content", button 11x11 "Slide 1", button 11x11 "Slide 2", button 11x11 "Slide 3", button 11x11 "Slide 4", button 11x11 (no visible label), button 11x11 (no visible label), button 11x11 (no visible label)

### 5. [MEDIUM] JavaScript crashed while the page was loading
Category: Conversion, Tracking
Why it matters: 1 script error fired during page load. When a script crashes, buttons sometimes stop working, analytics stop firing, and the visitor has no warning. Worth opening the browser console to find which script failed.
Exact elements found: gtag is not defined
How we know: median across loads

### 6. [MEDIUM] Page is heavy and slow on mobile data
Category: Performance
Why it matters: Each visit downloads about 2.2 MB, roughly 1109 KB of images and 704 KB of JavaScript across 88 separate downloads. On a fast connection that's fine. On a phone with patchy mobile data, that's several seconds of blank screen before the page is readable.
How we know: median across loads

### 7. [MEDIUM] Meta Pixel sends only PageView on this page
Category: Tracking
Why it matters: On this page the Meta Pixel sends only PageView. That is expected on a homepage, but check that a conversion event (a standard one like Lead, Schedule or Purchase, or a custom event) fires when a visitor actually converts, or that a custom conversion is set up in Events Manager. This scan loads pages and never submits a form or books a call, so it cannot see events that fire on those actions. If nothing fires there, Meta can optimise your ads for page views only.

### 8. [MEDIUM] 5 potential dead-click targets
Category: Conversion, Accessibility (WCAG), Tracking
Why it matters: At phone and desktop width, in our test browser, these elements are styled with a pointer cursor, the page's own mark for something clickable. They are not a link or a button, have no button or link role, no tabindex and no click attribute, and nothing on or around them opens a menu. A click handler attached by a script is not visible to this check, so click one to confirm it does something. Examples: "pricing" (span.ns-pill), "how-to" (span.ns-pill), "reviews" (span.ns-pill).
Exact elements found: "pricing" (span.ns-pill), "how-to" (span.ns-pill), "reviews" (span.ns-pill), "vs" (span.ns-pill), "best" (span.ns-pill)

### 9. [MEDIUM] 2 inputs use the wrong type attribute
Category: Conversion
Why it matters: Mobile keyboards adapt to the input type (email shows @ key, tel shows numeric pad). Generic type="text" gets a generic keyboard and visitors mis-type. Switch to the correct type, or add a matching inputmode attribute if the native validation is too strict for what people type (bare domains in a URL field, for example).
Exact elements found: name="website" → use type="url", name="agwebsite" → use type="url"

### 10. [MEDIUM] Security headers are missing or weak
Category: Security
Why it matters: The server response is missing browser-hardening headers that protect visitors and are a standard security and agency checklist item. Missing or weak here: Content-Security-Policy (the main defense against injected and cross-site scripts); clickjacking protection (X-Frame-Options or a CSP frame-ancestors rule); a stronger HSTS policy (max-age at least 180 days plus includeSubDomains); X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff (stops MIME-type sniffing attacks). These are set at the server, CDN, or host level (most platforms expose them in settings or a config file) and do not change how the site looks or performs.

### 11. [MEDIUM] 14 interactive elements have no stable, accessible identity
Category: Accessibility (WCAG), Tracking
Why it matters: These elements are clicked like buttons but expose no accessible name, or are a plain div/span used as a control with no role. Assistive tech announces only a role (or nothing), and analytics and heatmaps have no human-readable label or stable selector to bind the click to, so the click is both inaccessible and untrackable, and any redesign silently breaks click aggregation. Give each one a real <button>/<a>, an aria-label, and a stable id or data-attribute.
Exact elements found: "pricing" (span.ns-pill) (div/span used as a button, no role), "how-to" (span.ns-pill) (div/span used as a button, no role), "reviews" (span.ns-pill) (div/span used as a button, no role), "vs" (span.ns-pill) (div/span used as a button, no role), "best" (span.ns-pill) (div/span used as a button, no role), (button.hpd-car-dot) (no accessible name), (button.hpd-car-dot) (no accessible name), (button.hpd-car-dot) (no accessible name)

### 12. [LOW] Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)
Category: Performance, SEO
Why it matters: 17 of 25 images don't declare width and height. Your layout currently stays stable (measured Cumulative Layout Shift is 0, which is fine), most likely because space is reserved another way (CSS), so this is not causing visible jumps today. It is still worth setting explicit dimensions or a CSS aspect-ratio so a slow connection or a future style change cannot reintroduce shift.
Exact elements found (6 of 17): Blog-Typing-Effect.gif "Nina blog writing demo", Nina-Line-Chart-Icon.png "Traffic growth icon", TryNina-SEMrush-screenshot.png "SEMrush dashboard", Nina-Bar-Graph-Icon.png "Measurable improvements ", TryNina-Google-Search-Console-screenshot-grey.png "Google Search Console gr", Nina-Multi-Channel-Icon.png "Multi-channel icon"

### 13. [LOW] Unused JavaScript is being downloaded
Category: Performance
Why it matters: Code that never runs on this page still costs download and parse time on every visit. Splitting or removing it speeds up load. Lighthouse measured: Est savings of 140 KiB.

### 14. [LOW] The page loads from a lot of third-party services
Why it matters: Around 28 separate outside domains load on this page (analytics, ads, chat widgets, fonts). Each one is a connection that can be slow, fail, or change behavior outside your control.
How we know: median across loads

## How to respond
Work through the issues in order. For each one give me the specific change that fixes it: real code or real copy, not advice. Keep changes minimal and match the existing style of the site.
Where several issues share one root cause, say so and fix it once rather than patching each symptom.
If an issue cannot be fixed without seeing more of the code, say exactly which file or selector you need instead of guessing.
14 findings, ready to paste

02Performance: phone, desktop, and real visitors

MetricMobileDesktopRead
TTFB (lab median)8 ms8 msLab
FCP (lab median)74 ms72 msLab
LCP (lab median)158 ms156 msGood
Page weight (median)2.2 MB1.9 MBWatch

Google Lighthouse (lab): Performance 42 mobile / 87 desktop, SEO 100, Accessibility 85, Best Practices 96.

Lab numbers are from a headless mobile browser on an unthrottled connection: treat them as a floor, not a typical experience. Add a Google API key to light up real-user field data (CrUX) and Lighthouse scores.

03Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobile

13 of 40 tappable items on this page come in below the platform minimums for reliable tapping on a phone (Apple recommends 44pt, Android 48dp; WCAG 2.5.8 sets 24px as the hard accessibility floor). The same ones came up small on every one of the 6 test loads, so this is the page itself, not a fluke.

When customers can't tap what they expect to, they get frustrated and many of them leave. They don't file a bug. They don't try again. They just leave. A desktop dashboard can't see this because it's the difference between a thumb and a cursor.

The buttons measuring below the minimum on this scan:

  • a 1x1 "Skip to content"
  • button 11x11 "Slide 1"
  • button 11x11 "Slide 2"
  • button 11x11 "Slide 3"
  • button 11x11 "Slide 4"
  • button 11x11 (no visible label)
  • button 11x11 (no visible label)
  • button 11x11 (no visible label)

The fix is CSS-only on most sites: add padding around the icon (don't just change the icon size) so the actual tap area is at least 44×44 pixels. No redesign, no new assets.

04Technical SEO & structured data

CheckResult
TitleDone-For-You SEO Blog Writing Service - Nina (44 chars)
Meta description160 chars
H11 on page
CanonicalPresent
Structured data (JSON-LD)1 block(s)
Open GraphTitle + image

05The fix checklist

Everything to fix, priority first, each tagged with the screen it affects and a rough effort. Work top to bottom.

  1. Tiny buttons are hard to tap on mobileMobileCSS only
  2. JavaScript crashed while the page was loadingBothDev afternoon
  3. Page is heavy and slow on mobile dataBothSmall
  4. Images have no width or height set (layout is stable for now)BothCSS only
  5. Unused JavaScript is being downloadedBothVaries
  6. The page loads from a lot of third-party servicesBothDev afternoon
  7. 19 form fields have no labelBothVaries
  8. Add quotations so AI engines cite this pageBothVaries
  9. Meta Pixel sends only PageView on this pageBothVaries
  10. 5 potential dead-click targetsBothVaries
  11. 2 inputs use the wrong type attributeBothVaries
  12. Some buttons have no accessible nameBothVaries
  13. Security headers are missing or weakBothVaries
  14. 14 interactive elements have no stable, accessible identityBothDev afternoon

Effort is a rough read from the outside: "CSS only" means no new assets or backend work, "1 line" means a single tag, "Dev afternoon" means a developer needs to touch tracking or scripts.

06What this report cannot tell you

Everything above is from the outside, looking at the page on a simulated phone and desktop. The questions that actually decide revenue need real visitors. Install the Harvv pixel (one script tag, 16 KB, zero personal data, no engineering project) and within about 72 hours you'd know which buttons real customers tapped and missed, how often Google Analytics is missing visits, and exactly where mobile shoppers stalled and left. This report shows you where to look. The pixel shows you how often it happens, and to whom.

What to do next
See this same depth on your real visitors, every day.

Drop the Harvv pixel on trynina.co and we turn this one-off scan into ongoing measured behavior: which taps miss, where sessions stall, and the real drop rates. Free to start, no card needed.

Add the pixel free

07How we did this, and what it can't prove

  • 6 mobile + 3 desktop loads of one URL from headless Chrome (iPhone viewport at 390px, desktop at 1366px), September 28, 2026. Enough loads to separate real defects from random noise, not a full-site crawl.
  • Lab numbers, not real-user numbers (no field data was available for this run). Real devices on real networks run slower.
  • Friction is inferred, not counted. We can prove a button is small. We can't, from the outside, count how often it causes a missed tap. That requires the pixel on a live page.
  • This page rotates its content load to load, which is on its own a reason a single-shot scan can't be the last word on it.

About Harvv, the source of this teardown

Harvv is a behavioral UX analytics platform (harvv.com). A lightweight JavaScript pixel captures how real visitors behave on a site (dead clicks, rage clicks, scroll depth, Core Web Vitals, JavaScript errors, and 50+ other signals) and the engine turns them into prioritized, plain-English findings. This teardown is the outside-in version of that: the same detectors run against a public page, with no pixel installed.

How to read it. Every finding here is a reproducible, automated measurement, not an opinion: element sizes, contrast ratios, load metrics, and structured-data checks that anyone can re-run against the same URL. The method is stated in full above. Automated testing catches a subset of issues, so this is a starting point, not a certification.

Full disclosure. Harvv makes the pixel that would measure the friction these findings imply, so we have a commercial interest. That is exactly why the findings are kept to things a reader can verify independently, and why nothing here is inflated: an unreproducible claim would undermine the tool it is meant to demonstrate.

Prepared by Harvv (harvv.com), a behavioral UX analytics platform. Last updated September 28, 2026.

harvv://this-page live
Scroll depth how far you read0%
Dead clicks clicks that did nothing0
Rage clicks frustration bursts0
Interactions clicks that worked0
event log · live